Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mutant p53 Aggregates into Prion-like Amyloid Oligomers and Fibrils

Open access
Ano Bom, Ana P.D., Rangel, Luciana P., Costa, Danielly C.F., de Oliveira, Guilherme A.P., Sanches, Daniel, Braga, Carolina A., Gava, Lisandra M., Ramos, Carlos H.I., Cepeda, Ana O.T., Stumbo, Ana C., De Moura Gallo, Claudia V., Cordeiro, Yraima, Silva, Jerson L.·2012·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Over 50% of all human cancers lose p53 function. To evaluate the role of aggregation in cancer, we asked whether wild-type (WT) p53 and the hot-spot mutant R248Q could aggregate as amyloids under physiological conditions and whether the mutant could seed aggregation of the wild-type form. The central domains (p53C) of both constructs aggregated into a mixture of oligomers and fibrils. R248Q had a greater tendency to aggregate than WT p53. Full-length p53 aggregated into amyloid-like species that bound thioflavin T. The amyloid nature of the aggregates was demonstrated using x-ray diffraction, electron microscopy, FTIR, dynamic light scattering, cell viabilility assay, and anti-amyloid immunoassay. The x-ray diffraction pattern of the fibrillar aggregates was consistent with the typical conformation of cross β-sheet amyloid fibers with reflexions of 4.7 Å and 10 Å. A seed of R248Q p53C amyloid oligomers and fibrils accelerated the aggregation of WT p53C, a behavior typical of a prion. The R248Q mutant co-localized with amyloid-like species in a breast cancer sample, which further supported its prion-like effect. A tumor cell line containing mutant p53 also revealed massive aggregation of p53 in the nucleus. We conclude that aggregation of p53 into a mixture of oligomers and fibrils sequestrates the native protein into an inactive conformation that is typical of a prionoid. This prion-like behavior of oncogenic p53 mutants provides an explanation for the negative dominance effect and may serve as a potential target for cancer therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m112.340638

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Ano Bom, A. P. D., Rangel, L. P., Costa, D. C. F., de Oliveira, G. A. P., Sanches, D., Braga, C. A., Gava, L. M., Ramos, C. H. I., Cepeda, A. O. T., Stumbo, A. C., De Moura Gallo, C. V., Cordeiro, Y., & Silva, J. L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
287
Issue
33
Pages
28152-28162
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132188221
Cited by
280
References
6
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutant p53 Aggregates into Prion-like Amyloid Oligomers and Fibrils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m112.340638
The paper
Ano Bom, A. P. D., Rangel, L. P., Costa, D. C. F., de Oliveira, G. A. P., Sanches, D., Braga, C. A., Gava, L. M., Ramos, C. H. I., Cepeda, A. O. T., Stumbo, A. C., De Moura Gallo, C. V., Cordeiro, Y., & Silva, J. L. (2012). Mutant p53 Aggregates into Prion-like Amyloid Oligomers and Fibrils. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m112.340638

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.