The DOI matches its Crossref record.
FEEL-1, a Novel Scavenger Receptor with in Vitro Bacteria-binding and Angiogenesis-modulating Activities
Open accessAbstract
Employing the expression cloning technique, we cloned a novel scavenger receptor that is structurally unrelated to other scavenger receptors. The cloned receptor contained fasciclin (Fas-1), epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like, laminin-type EGF-like, and link domains. Based on the domain structures, we temporarily named it FEEL-1 (fasciclin, EGF-like, laminin-type EGF-like, and link domain-containing scavenger receptor-1). A data base search suggested the presence of a paralogous gene of FEEL-1, the full-length cDNA of this gene was also cloned, and its nucleotide sequence was determined. The deduced amino acid sequence of the clone indicated that its domain organization is similar to FEEL-1, and we named this clone FEEL-2. The effect of monoclonal antibodies against FEEL-1 indicated that FEEL-1 is the major receptor for 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethyl-indocarbo-cyanine perchlorate (DiI)-labeled acetylated low density lipoprotein (DiI-Ac-LDL) in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Reverse transcription and PCR analysis revealed that both FEEL-1 and FEEL-2 were expressed in several tissues and expressed highly in the spleen and lymph node. On the other hand, only FEEL-1 was expressed in mononuclear cells, particularly resting CD14(+) cells. The transient expression of FEEL-1 and FEEL-2 in Chinese hamster ovary cells demonstrated that both FEELs could bind to DiI-Ac-LDL. Both receptors were also found to bind to Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. These results suggest that FEELs play important roles in the defense mechanisms against bacterial infection. Finally, the phenotypic effect of the inhibition of FEEL-1 on vascular remodeling was tested in vitro using the Matrigel tube formation assay, and we found a marked reduction in the degree of cell-cell interaction in anti-FEEL-1 monoclonal antibody-treated cells, suggesting the role of this receptor in angiogenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A human liver cell atlas reveals heterogeneity and epithelial progenitors
Aizarani, N., Saviano, A., Sagar, Mailly, L., Durand, S., Herman, J. S., Pessaux, P., Baumert, T. F., & Grün, D. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1373-2 · Cited by 1,147
Role of advanced glycation end products in cellular signaling
Ott, C., Jacobs, K., Haucke, E., Navarrete Santos, A., Grune, T., & Simm, A. (2014) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2013.12.016 · Cited by 1,150
Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells in homeostasis
Arandjelovic, S., & Ravichandran, K. S. (2015) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3253 · Cited by 959
Twarda-Clapa, A., Olczak, A., Białkowska, A. M., & Koziołkiewicz, M. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11081312 · Cited by 746
Dastani, Z., Hivert, M.-F., Timpson, N., Perry, J. R. B., Yuan, X., Scott, R. A., Henneman, P., Heid, I. M., Kizer, J. R., Lyytikäinen, L.-P., et al. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002607 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Adachi, H., & Tsujimoto, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 34264-34270
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981330494
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FEEL-1, a Novel Scavenger Receptor with in Vitro Bacteria-binding and Angiogenesis-modulating Activities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m204277200
- The paper
- Adachi, H., & Tsujimoto, M. (2002). FEEL-1, a Novel Scavenger Receptor with in Vitro Bacteria-binding and Angiogenesis-modulating Activities. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m204277200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.