CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Novel Endocytic Recycling Signal That Distinguishes the Membrane Trafficking of Naturally Occurring Opioid Receptors

Tanowitz, Michael, von Zastrow, Mark·2003·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m304504200
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

delta and micro opioid receptors are homologous G protein-coupled receptors that are differentially sorted between divergent degradative and recycling membrane pathways following agonist-induced endocytosis. Whereas delta opioid receptors are selectively sorted to lysosomes, micro opioid receptors recycle rapidly to the plasma membrane by a process that has been proposed to occur via bulk membrane flow. We have observed that micro opioid receptors do not recycle by default and have defined a specific sequence present in the cytoplasmic tail of the cloned micro opioid receptor that is both necessary and sufficient for rapid recycling of internalized receptors. This sequence is completely distinct from a sequence shown previously to be required for recycling of the beta2 adrenergic receptor yet is functionally interchangeable when tested in chimeric mutant receptors. These results indicate that signal-dependent recycling is a more common property of G protein-coupled receptors than previously appreciated and demonstrate that such a modular recycling signal distinguishes the regulation of homologous receptors that are naturally co-expressed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m304504200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Receptor recycling can be a signal-mediated event.

    “Although receptor recycling is generally believed to be a default pathway, recent studies have provided evidence that it can also be a signal-mediated event (Tanowitz and von Zastrow, 2003;Tran et al, 2003;Vargas and Von Zastrow, 2004).”

    From Sorting nexin 17 facilitates LRP recycling in the early endosome (2005) · cites this paper as Tanowitz and von Zastrow, 2003

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Goodman, 1998, Adv. Pharmacol., 42, 429, 10.1016/S1054-3589(08)60780-2 · DOI
  2. Ferguson, 1998, Life Sci., 62, 1561, 10.1016/S0024-3205(98)00107-6 · DOI
  3. Tsao, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 11130, 10.1074/jbc.275.15.11130 · DOI
  4. Lefkowitz, 1998, Adv. Pharmacol., 42, 416, 10.1016/S1054-3589(08)60777-2 · DOI
  5. Trejo, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 13698, 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13698 · DOI
  6. Marchese, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 45509, 10.1074/jbc.C100527200 · DOI
  7. Tanowitz, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 50219, 10.1074/jbc.C200536200 · DOI
  8. Whistler, 2002, Science, 297, 615, 10.1126/science.1073308 · DOI
  9. Shih, 2002, Nat. Cell Biol., 4, 389, 10.1038/ncb790 · DOI
  10. Mayor, 1993, J. Cell Biol., 121, 1257, 10.1083/jcb.121.6.1257 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Levkowitz, 1998, Genes Dev., 12, 3663, 10.1101/gad.12.23.3663 · DOI
  12. Anborgh, 2000, Mol. Endocrinol., 14, 2040
  13. Trejo, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 2216, 10.1074/jbc.274.4.2216 · DOI
  14. Cao, 1999, Nature, 401, 286, 10.1038/45816 · DOI
  15. Gage, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 44712, 10.1074/jbc.M107417200 · DOI
  16. Cong, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 45145, 10.1074/jbc.M106087200 · DOI
  17. Lee, 2002, Synapse, 43, 102, 10.1002/syn.10014 · DOI
  18. Cheng, 1997, Brain Res., 778, 367, 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)00891-3 · DOI
  19. Cahill, 2001, J. Neurosci., 21, 7598, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-19-07598.2001 · DOI
  20. Zhang, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 7157, 10.1073/pnas.95.12.7157 · DOI
  21. Whistler, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 9914, 10.1073/pnas.95.17.9914 · DOI
  22. Beland, 2001, Pain, 90, 143, 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00397-3 · DOI
  23. Law, 1999, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 289, 607
  24. Tsao, 2000, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 10, 365, 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00096-9 · DOI
  25. Finn, 2001, Neuron, 32, 829, 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00517-7 · DOI
  26. Shenoy, 2001, Science, 294, 1307, 10.1126/science.1063866 · DOI
  27. Chaturvedi, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 12345, 10.1074/jbc.M008054200 · DOI
  28. Tao, 1998, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 344, 137, 10.1016/S0014-2999(97)01596-3 · DOI
  29. Li, 2001, Mol. Pharmacol., 60, 1064, 10.1124/mol.60.5.1064 · DOI
  30. Evans, 1992, Science, 258, 1952, 10.1126/science.1335167 · DOI
  31. Kaufman, 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 15877, 10.1074/jbc.270.26.15877 · DOI
  32. Kobilka, 1987, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 84, 46, 10.1073/pnas.84.1.46 · DOI
  33. Chen, 1987, Mol. Cell. Biol., 7, 2745
  34. Keith, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 19021, 10.1074/jbc.271.32.19021 · DOI
  35. Koenig, 1997, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 18, 276, 10.1016/S0165-6147(97)90643-X · DOI
  36. Hall, 1998, Nature, 392, 626, 10.1038/33458 · DOI
  37. Wang, 2002, Mol. Biol. Cell, 13, 1965, 10.1091/mbc.e01-11-0131 · DOI
  38. Kurten, 1996, Science, 272, 1008, 10.1126/science.272.5264.1008 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Hicke, 1999, Trends Cell Biol., 9, 107, 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01491-3 · DOI
  40. Gruenberg, 2001, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2, 721, 10.1038/35096054 · DOI
  41. Paasche, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 34041, 10.1074/jbc.M103243200 · DOI
  42. Kishi, 2001, Mol. Endocrinol., 15, 1624, 10.1210/mend.15.9.0698 · DOI
  43. Galet, 2003, Mol. Endocrinol., 17, 411, 10.1210/me.2002-0161 · DOI
  44. Li, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 27545, 10.1074/jbc.M200058200 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tanowitz, M., & von Zastrow, M.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
278
Issue
46
Pages
45978-45986
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.m304504200
Cited by
169
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review