The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sorting of membrane components from endosomes and subsequent recycling to the cell surface occurs by a bulk flow process
Abstract
A central question in the endocytic process concerns the mechanism for sorting of recycling components (such as transferrin or low density lipoprotein receptors) from lysosomally directed components; membrane-associated molecules including receptors are generally directed towards the recycling pathway while the luminal content of sorting endosomes, consisting of the acid-released ligands, are lysosomally targeted. However, it is not known whether recycling membrane receptors follow bulk membrane flow or if these proteins are actively sorted from lysosomally directed material because of specific protein sequences and/or structural features. Using quantitative fluorescence microscopy we have determined the endocytic route and kinetics of traffic of the bulk carrier, membrane lipids, to address this issue directly. We show that N-[N-(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)-epsilon-aminohexanoyl]- sphingosylphosphorylcholine (C6-NBD-SM) in endocytosed as bulk membrane, and it transits the endocytic system kinetically and morphologically identically to fluorescently labeled transferrin in a CHO cell line. With indistinguishable kinetics, the two labeled markers sort from lysosomally destined molecules in peripherally located sorting endosomes, accumulate in a peri-centriolar recycling compartment, and finally exit the cell. Other fluorescently labeled lipids, C6-NBD-phosphatidylcholine and galactosylceramide also traverse the same pathway. The constitutive nature of sorting of bulk membrane towards the recycling pathway and the lysosomal direction of fluid phase implies a geometric basis of sorting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have revealed heterogeneity in recycling of different receptors: LDLR is transported along a RAB11-mediated slow recycling pathway involving the endocytic recycling compartment, while TFR utilizes both RAB11- and RAB4-mediated rapid recycling pathways.
“Previous studies have revealed heterogeneity in the recycling of different receptors, with some, including LDLR, transported along a RAB11-mediated slow recycling pathway involving the endocytic recycling compartment, while others, including TFR, utilize both RAB11- and RAB4-mediated rapid recycling pathways (20, 42, 43).”
From The small GTPase RAB10 regulates endosomal recycling of the LDL receptor and transferrin receptor in hepatocytes (2022) · cites this paper as [42]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internalization and degradation of macrophage Fc receptors bound to polyvalent immune complexes.
Mellman, I., & Plutner, H. (1984) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.98.4.1170 · Cited by 251
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biogenesis and Function of Multivesicular Bodies
Piper, R. C., & Katzmann, D. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123319 · Cited by 771
To degrade or not to degrade: Mechanisms and significance of endocytic recycling
Cullen, P. J., & Steinberg, F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0053-7 · Cited by 590
Retromer: A Master Conductor of Endosome Sorting
Burd, C., & Cullen, P. J. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016774 · Cited by 435
ORGANELLES AND TRAFFICKING MACHINERY FOR POSTSYNAPTIC PLASTICITY
Kennedy, M. J., & Ehlers, M. D. (2006) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112808 · Cited by 346
Breuer, W., Epsztejn, S., & Cabantchik, Z. I. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.41.24209 · Cited by 326
Phagocytosis and Intracellular Fate of Aspergillus fumigatus Conidia in Alveolar Macrophages
Ibrahim-Granet, O., Philippe, B., Boleti, H., Boisvieux-Ulrich, E., Grenet, D., Stern, M., & Latgé, J. P. (2003) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.71.2.891-903.2003 · Cited by 277
Conti, F., Sertic, S., Reversi, A., & Chini, B. (2009) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.90590.2008 · Cited by 113
The endo-lysosomal system of bEnd.3 and hCMEC/D3 brain endothelial cells
Toth, A. E., Nielsen, S. S. E., Tomaka, W., Abbott, N. J., & Nielsen, M. S. (2019) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/s12987-019-0134-9 · Cited by 40
Khan, T. G., Ginsburg, D., & Emmer, B. T. (2022) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100248 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayor, S., Presley, J. F., & Maxfield, F. R.
- Affiliations
- Department of Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1993-06-15
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1257-1269
- ISSN
- 0021-9525
- 1540-8140
- PMC
- PMC2119709
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review