Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nanoparticles of Compacted DNA Transfect Postmitotic Cells

Open access
Liu, Ge, Li, DeShan, Pasumarthy, Murali K., Kowalczyk, Tomasz H., Gedeon, Christopher R., Hyatt, Susannah L., Payne, Jennifer M., Miller, Timothy J., Brunovskis, Peter, Fink, Tamara L., Muhammad, Osman, Moen, Robert C., Hanson, Richard W., Cooper, Mark J.·2003·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Charge-neutral DNA nanoparticles have been developed in which single molecules of DNA are compacted to their minimal possible size. We speculated that the small size of these DNA nanoparticles may facilitate gene transfer in postmitotic cells, permitting nuclear uptake across the 25-nm nuclear membrane pore. To determine whether DNA nanoparticles can transfect nondividing cells, growth-arrested neuroblastoma and hepatoma cells were transfected with DNA/liposome mixtures encoding luciferase. In both models, growth-arrested cells were robustly transfected by compacted DNA (6,900-360-fold more than naked DNA). To evaluate mechanisms responsible for enhanced transfection, HuH-7 cells were microinjected with naked or compacted plasmids encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein. Cytoplasmic microinjection of DNA nanoparticles generated a approximately 10-fold improvement in transgene expression as compared with naked DNA; this enhancement was reversed by the nuclear pore inhibitor, wheat germ agglutinin. To determine the upper size limit for gene transfer, DNA nanoparticles of various sizes were microinjected into the cytoplasm. A marked decrease in transgene expression was observed as the minor ellipsoidal diameter approached 25 nm. In summary, suitably sized DNA nanoparticles productively transfect growth arrested cells by traversing the nuclear membrane pore.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m305776200

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Liu, G., Li, D., Pasumarthy, M. K., Kowalczyk, T. H., Gedeon, C. R., Hyatt, S. L., Payne, J. M., Miller, T. J., Brunovskis, P., Fink, T. L., Muhammad, O., Moen, R. C., Hanson, R. W., & Cooper, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
278
Issue
35
Pages
32578-32586
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030953063
Cited by
190
References
0
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoparticles of Compacted DNA Transfect Postmitotic Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m305776200
The paper
Liu, G., Li, D., Pasumarthy, M. K., Kowalczyk, T. H., Gedeon, C. R., Hyatt, S. L., Payne, J. M., Miller, T. J., Brunovskis, P., Fink, T. L., Muhammad, O., Moen, R. C., Hanson, R. W., & Cooper, M. J. (2003). Nanoparticles of Compacted DNA Transfect Postmitotic Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m305776200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.