Cited by 433Sphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Phosphorylation of the immunomodulatory drug FTY720 by sphingosine kinases

Open access
Billich, Andreas, Bornancin, Frederic, Dévay, Piroska, Mechtcheriakova, Diana, Urtz, Nicole, Baumruker, Thomas·2003·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The immunomodulatory drug FTY720 is phosphorylated in vivo, and the resulting FTY720 phosphate as a ligand for sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors is responsible for the unique biological effects of the compound. So far, phosphorylation of FTY720 by murine sphingosine kinase (SPHK) 1a had been documented. We found that, while FTY720 is also phosphorylated by human SPHK1, the human type 2 isoform phosphorylates the drug 30-fold more efficiently, because of a lower Km of FTY720 for SPHK2. Similarly, murine SPHK2 was more efficient than SPHK1a. Among splice variants of the human SPHKs, an N-terminally extended SPHK2 isoform was even more active than SPHK2 itself. Further SPHK superfamily members, namely ceramide kinase and a "SPHK-like" protein, failed to phosphorylate sphingosine and FTY720. Thus, only SPHK1 and 2 appear to be capable of phosphorylating FTY720. Using selective assay conditions, SPHK1 and 2 activities in murine tissues were measured. While activity of SPHK2 toward sphingosine was generally lower than of SPHK1, FTY720 phosphorylation was higher under conditions favoring SPHK2. In human endothelial cells, while activity of SPHK1 toward sphingosine was 2-fold higher than of SPHK2, FTY720 phosphorylation was 7-fold faster under SPHK2 assay conditions. Finally, FTY720 was poorly phosphorylated in human blood as compared with rodent blood, in line with the low activity of SPHK1 and in particular of SPHK2 in human blood. To conclude, both SPHK1 and 2 are capable of phosphorylating FTY720, but SPHK2 is quantitatively more important than SPHK1.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m307687200

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FTY720 localizes to the cytoplasm and nucleus after permeabilization of the plasma membrane, and is converted to its S1P analog, FTY720 phosphate (FTY720-P), upon phosphorylation by SphK2.

    “FTY720 localizes to the cytoplasm and nucleus after permeabilization of the plasma membrane, and is converted to its S1P analog, FTY720 phosphate (FTY720-P), upon phosphorylation by SphK2 (33).”

    From Nuclear SphK2/S1P signaling is a key regulator of ApoE production and Aβ uptake in astrocytes (2024) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Abstract and Conclusions state that SphK2 phosphorylates FTY720 to form FTY720 phosphate. Our copy does not establish the claimed localization to the cytoplasm and nucleus after plasma-membrane permeabilization; searches for permeabilization and intracellular localization found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in the indexed copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • FTY720 is phosphorylated by SphK2 to produce the S1P analog, FTY720-P.

    “The sphingosine analog, FTY720, is phosphorylated by SphK2 to produce the S1P analog, FTY720-P.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]1. Brinkmann, V. ∙ Pinschewer, D.D. ∙ Feng, L. ... Transplantation. 2001; 72:764-769 Crossref Scopus (158) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Brinkmann, V. ∙ Lynch, K.R. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2002; 14:569-575 Crossref Scopus (256) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Pinschewer, D.D. ∙ Ochsenbein, A.F. ∙ Odermatt, B. ... J. Immunol. 2000; 164:5761-5770 Crossref Scopus (349) PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Chiba, K. ∙ Yanagawa, Y. ∙ Masubuchi, Y. ... J. Immunol. 1998; 160:5037-5044 PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [5]5. Brinkmann, V. ∙ Davis, M.D. ∙ Heise, C.E. ... J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277:21453-21457 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (1366) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. [6]6. Mandala, S. ∙ Hajdu, R. ∙ Bergstrom, J. ... Science. 2002; 296:346-349 Crossref Scopus (1506) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [7]7. Honig, S.M. ∙ Fu, S. ∙ Mao, X. ... J. Clin. Invest. 2003; 111:627-637 Crossref Scopus (124) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. [8]8. Liu, H. ∙ Sugiura, M. ∙ Nava, V.E. ... J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 275:19513-19520 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (577) Google Scholar
  9. [9]9. Kohama, T. ∙ Olivera, A. ∙ Edsall, L. ... J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273:23722-237228 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (483) PubMed Google Scholar
  10. [10]10. Spiegel, S. ∙ Milstien, S. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003; 4:397-407 Crossref Scopus (1828) PubMed Google Scholar
  11. [11]11. Hla, T. Pharmacol. Res. 2003; 47:401-407 Crossref Scopus (248) PubMed Google Scholar
  12. [12]12. Melendez, A.J. ∙ Khaw, A.K. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277:17255-17262 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (149) PubMed Google Scholar
  13. [13]13. Shu, X. ∙ Wu, W. ∙ Mosteller, R.D. ... Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002; 22:7758-7768 Crossref Scopus (251) PubMed Google Scholar
  14. [14]14. Gijsbers, S. ∙ Van der Hoeven, G. ∙ Van Veldhoven, P.P. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2001; 1532:37-50 Crossref Scopus (34) PubMed Google Scholar
  15. [15]15. Sugiura, M. ∙ Kono, K. ∙ Liu, H. ... J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277:23294-23300 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (259) PubMed Google Scholar
  16. [16]16. Schenborn, E.T. ∙ Goiffon, V. Methods Mol. Biol. 2000; 130:135-145 PubMed Google Scholar
  17. [17]17. Olivera, A. ∙ Barlow, K.D. ∙ Spiegel, S. Methods Enzymol. 2000; 311:215-223 Crossref Scopus (70) PubMed Google Scholar
  18. [18]18. Stahl, E. Thin-layer Chromatography Springer Verlag, New York, 1969; 904 Google Scholar
  19. [19]19. Pitson, S.M. ∙ D'Andrea, R.J. ∙ Vandeleur, L. ... Biochem. J. 2000; 350:429-441 Crossref Scopus (166) PubMed Google Scholar
  20. [20]20. Banno, Y. ∙ Kato, M. ∙ Hara, A. ... Biochem. J. 1998; 335:301-304 Crossref Scopus (53) PubMed Google Scholar
  21. [21]21. Nava, V.E. ∙ Lacana, E. ∙ Poulton, S. ... FEBS Lett. 2000; 473:81-84 Crossref Scopus (91) PubMed Google Scholar
  22. [22]22. Pitson, S.M. ∙ Moretti, P.A. ∙ Zebol, J.R. ... J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 275:33945-33950 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (172) Google Scholar
  23. [23]23. Melendez, A.J. ∙ Carlos-Dias, E. ∙ Gosink, M. ... Gene (Amst.). 2000; 251:19-26 Crossref Scopus (127) PubMed Google Scholar
  24. [24]24. Gijsbers, S. ∙ Asselberghs, S. ∙ Herdewijn, P. ... Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2002; 1580:1-8 Crossref Scopus (11) PubMed Google Scholar
  25. [25]25. Olivera, A. ∙ Kohama, T. ∙ Tu, Z. ... J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273:12576-12583 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (207) PubMed Google Scholar Figures (3) Article metrics Related Articles Advertisement Hide CaptionDownloadSee figure in Article Toggle Thumbstrip Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Download .PPT Home Access for Developing Countries Articles Papers in Press Current Volume Archive Editorials ASBMB Award Articles JBC Reviews Meeting Reports Thematic Series Virtual Issues Classics Reflections Editors' Picks JBC Communications eLetters Tabor Awards For Authors Information for Authors About Open Access Permissions Submit manuscript Submission Help Contact Us Contact Information Journal Info About the Journal Early Career Reviewers Editorial Board Image Gallery New Content Alerts All Topics Bioenergetics Cell Biology Computational Biology Developmental Biology DNA and Chromosomes Enzymology Gene Regulation Genomics and Proteomics Glycobiology and Extracellular Matrices Immunology Lipids Membrane Biology Metabolism

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Billich, A., Bornancin, F., Dévay, P., Mechtcheriakova, D., Urtz, N., & Baumruker, T.
Affiliations
Novartis (Austria) (AT)
Corresponding author
Billich, Andreas
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
278
Issue
48
Pages
47408-47415
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973573934
Cited by
433
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 27
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
fingolimod, sphingosine kinase 1, sphingosine kinase 2, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor, enzyme kinetics, splice variants, ceramide kinase, endothelial cells, immunomodulators
MeSH terms
Fingolimod Hydrochloride, Sphingosine Kinase, Animals, Cell Line, Cloning, Molecular, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Kinetics, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Phosphorylation, Propylene Glycols, Sphingosine, Tissue Distribution, Genetic Variation, Blotting, Northern, Genome, Human, Rats, Wistar, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Phosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor), DNA, Complementary, Protein Isoforms, Endothelial Cells, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review