The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Affinity of the Dynein Microtubule-binding Domain Is Modulated by the Conformation of Its Coiled-coil Stalk
Open accessAbstract
The microtubule-binding domain (MTBD) of dynein is separated from the AAA (ATPase with any other activity) core of the motor by an approximately 15-nm stalk that is predicted to consist of an antiparallel coiled coil. However, the structure of this coiled coil and the mechanism it uses to mediate communication between the MTBD and ATP-binding core are unknown. Here, we sought to identify the optimal alignment between the hydrophobic heptad repeats in the two strands of the stalk coiled coil. To do this, we fused the MTBD of mouse cytoplasmic dynein, together with 12-36 residues of its stalk, onto a stable coiled-coil base provided by Thermus thermophilus seryl-tRNA synthetase and tested these chimeric constructs for microtubule binding in vitro. The results identified one alignment that yielded a protein displaying high affinity for microtubules (2.2 microM). The effects of mutations applied to the MTBD of this construct paralleled those previously reported (Koonce, M. P., and Tikhonenko, I. (2000) Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 523-529) for an intact dynein motor unit in the absence of ATP, suggesting that it resembles the tight binding state of native intact dynein. All other alignments showed at least 10-fold lower affinity for microtubules with the exception of one, which had an intermediate affinity. Based on these results and on amino acid sequence analysis, we hypothesize that dynein utilizes small amounts of sliding displacement between the two strands of its coiled-coil stalk as a means of communication between the AAA core of the motor and the MTBD during the mechanochemical cycle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Molecular Motor Toolbox for Intracellular Transport
Vale, R. D. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00111-9 · Cited by 1,982
Self-citation
Cited by
Functions and mechanics of dynein motor proteins
Roberts, A. J., Kon, T., Knight, P. J., Sutoh, K., & Burgess, S. A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3667 · Cited by 537
Poirier, K., Lebrun, N., Broix, L., Tian, G., Saillour, Y., Boscheron, C., Parrini, E., Valence, S., Pierre, B. S., Oger, M., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2613 · Cited by 494
The 2.8 Å crystal structure of the dynein motor domain
Kon, T., Oyama, T., Shimo-Kon, R., Imamula, K., Shima, T., Sutoh, K., & Kurisu, G. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10955 · Cited by 260
Helix sliding in the stalk coiled coil of dynein couples ATPase and microtubule binding
Kon, T., Imamula, K., Roberts, A. J., Ohkura, R., Knight, P. J., Gibbons, I. R., Burgess, S. A., & Sutoh, K. (2009) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1555 · Cited by 169
Self-citationPropulsive nanomachines: the convergent evolution of archaella, flagella and cilia
Beeby, M., Ferreira, J. L., Tripp, P., Albers, S.-V., & Mitchell, D. R. (2020) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuaa006 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbons, I. R., Garbarino, J. E., Tan, C. E., Reck-Peterson, S. L., Vale, R. D., & Carter, A. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 280
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 23960-23965
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157961198
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Affinity of the Dynein Microtubule-binding Domain Is Modulated by the Conformation of Its Coiled-coil Stalk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m501636200
- The paper
- Gibbons, I. R., Garbarino, J. E., Tan, C. E., Reck-Peterson, S. L., Vale, R. D., & Carter, A. P. (2005). The Affinity of the Dynein Microtubule-binding Domain Is Modulated by the Conformation of Its Coiled-coil Stalk. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m501636200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.