The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental and in Silico Analyses of Glycolytic Flux Control in Bloodstream Form Trypanosoma brucei
Open accessAbstract
A mathematical model of glycolysis in bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei was developed previously on the basis of all available enzyme kinetic data (Bakker, B. M., Michels, P. A. M., Opperdoes, F. R., and Westerhoff, H. V. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3207-3215). The model predicted correctly the fluxes and cellular metabolite concentrations as measured in non-growing trypanosomes and the major contribution to the flux control exerted by the plasma membrane glucose transporter. Surprisingly, a large overcapacity was predicted for hexokinase (HXK), phosphofructokinase (PFK), and pyruvate kinase (PYK). Here, we present our further analysis of the control of glycolytic flux in bloodstream form T. brucei. First, the model was optimized and extended with recent information about the kinetics of enzymes and their activities as measured in lysates of in vitro cultured growing trypanosomes. Second, the concentrations of five glycolytic enzymes (HXK, PFK, phosphoglycerate mutase, enolase, and PYK) in trypanosomes were changed by RNA interference. The effects of the knockdown of these enzymes on the growth, activities, and levels of various enzymes and glycolytic flux were studied and compared with model predictions. Data thus obtained support the conclusion from the in silico analysis that HXK, PFK, and PYK are in excess, albeit less than predicted. Interestingly, depletion of PFK and enolase had an effect on the activity (but not, or to a lesser extent, expression) of some other glycolytic enzymes. Enzymes located both in the glycosomes (the peroxisome-like organelles harboring the first seven enzymes of the glycolytic pathway of trypanosomes) and in the cytosol were affected. These data suggest the existence of novel regulatory mechanisms operating in trypanosome glycolysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The return of metabolism: biochemistry and physiology of the pentose phosphate pathway
Stincone, A., Prigione, A., Cramer, T., Wamelink, M. M. C., Campbell, K., Cheung, E., Olin‐Sandoval, V., Grüning, N., Krüger, A., Tauqeer Alam, M., et al. (2015) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12140 · Cited by 1,576
Bruggeman, F. J., & Westerhoff, H. V. (2007) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2006.11.003 · Cited by 531
From in vivo to in silico biology and back
Di Ventura, B., Lemerle, C., Michalodimitrakis, K., & Serrano, L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05127 · Cited by 290
A model of yeast glycolysis based on a consistent kinetic characterisation of all its enzymes
Smallbone, K., Messiha, H. L., Carroll, K. M., Winder, C. L., Malys, N., Dunn, W. B., Murabito, E., Swainston, N., Dada, J. O., Khan, F., et al. (2013) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.06.043 · Cited by 147
What Can We Learn from Global Sensitivity Analysis of Biochemical Systems?
Kent, E., Neumann, S., Kummer, U., & Mendes, P. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079244 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Albert, M.-A., Haanstra, J. R., Hannaert, V., Van Roy, J., Opperdoes, F. R., Bakker, B. M., & Michels, P. A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 280
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 28306-28315
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021123893
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental and in Silico Analyses of Glycolytic Flux Control in Bloodstream Form Trypanosoma brucei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m502403200
- The paper
- Albert, M.-A., Haanstra, J. R., Hannaert, V., Van Roy, J., Opperdoes, F. R., Bakker, B. M., & Michels, P. A. M. (2005). Experimental and in Silico Analyses of Glycolytic Flux Control in Bloodstream Form Trypanosoma brucei. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m502403200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.