The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Density of Octaarginine Stimulates Macropinocytosis Leading to Efficient Intracellular Trafficking for Gene Expression
Open accessAbstract
The mechanism of the arginine-rich peptide-mediated cellular uptake is currently a controversial issue. Several factors, including the type of peptide, the nature of the cargo, and the linker between them, appear to affect uptake. One of the less studied factors, which may affect the uptake mechanism, is the effect of peptide density on the surface of the cargo. Here, we examined the mechanism of cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of liposomes modified with different densities of the octaarginine (R8) peptide. Liposomes modified with a low R8 density were taken up mainly through clathrin-mediated endocytosis, leading to extensive lysosomal degradation, whereas those modified with a high R8 density were taken up mainly through macropinocytosis and were less subject to lysosomal degradation. Furthermore, the high density R8-liposomes were able to stimulate the macropinocytosis-mediated uptake of other particles. When plasmid DNA was condensed and encapsulated in R8-liposomes, the levels of gene expression were three orders of magnitude higher for the high density liposomes. The enhanced gene expression by the high density R8-liposomes was highly impaired by blocking uptake through macropinocytosis. The different extents of gene expression from different densities of the R8 peptide on the liposomes could be explained principally by the existence of an intracellular trafficking route, but not by the uptake amount, of internalized liposomes. These results show that the density of the R8 peptide on liposomes determines the uptake mechanism and that this is directly linked to intracellular trafficking, resulting in different levels of gene expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wadia, J. S., Stan, R. V., & Dowdy, S. F. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm996 · Cited by 1,647
Cited by
Jiang, T., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Lv, H., Zhou, J., Li, C., Hou, L., & Zhang, Q. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.027 · Cited by 359
Cell-Specific Delivery of Diverse Cargos by Bacteriophage MS2 Virus-like Particles
Ashley, C. E., Carnes, E. C., Phillips, G. K., Durfee, P. N., Buley, M. D., Lino, C. A., Padilla, D. P., Phillips, B., Carter, M. B., Willman, C. L., et al. (2011) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn201397z · Cited by 350
Herce, H. D., Garcia, A. E., Litt, J., Kane, R. S., Martin, P., Enrique, N., Rebolledo, A., & Milesi, V. (2009) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.066 · Cited by 305
Magnetic Nanoparticles in Targeted Drug Delivery: a Review
kianfar, E. (2021) · Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism · doi:10.1007/s10948-021-05932-9 · Cited by 280
Cellular siRNA delivery using cell-penetrating peptides modified for endosomal escape
Endoh, T., & Ohtsuki, T. (2009) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2009.04.005 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Khalil, I. A., Kogure, K., Futaki, S., & Harashima, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 281
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3544-3551
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028469454
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Density of Octaarginine Stimulates Macropinocytosis Leading to Efficient Intracellular Trafficking for Gene Expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m503202200
- The paper
- Khalil, I. A., Kogure, K., Futaki, S., & Harashima, H. (2006). High Density of Octaarginine Stimulates Macropinocytosis Leading to Efficient Intracellular Trafficking for Gene Expression. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m503202200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.