Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Basis for Selectivity of Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides for Bacterial Versus Mammalian Membranes

Open access
Glukhov, Evgenia, Stark, Margareta, Burrows, Lori L., Deber, Charles M.·2005·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Novel cationic antimicrobial peptides typified by structures such as KKKKKKAAXAAWAAXAA-NH2, where X = Phe/Trp, and several of their analogues display high activity against a variety of bacteria but exhibit no hemolytic activity even at high dose levels in mammalian erythrocytes. To elucidate their mechanism of action and source of selectivity for bacterial membranes, phospholipid mixtures mimicking the compositions of natural bacterial membranes (containing anionic lipids) and mammalian membranes (containing zwitterionic lipids + cholesterol) were challenged with the peptides. We found that peptides readily inserted into bacterial lipid mixtures, although no insertion was detected in model "mammalian" membranes. The depth of peptide insertion into model bacterial membranes was estimated by Trp fluorescence quenching using doxyl groups variably positioned along the phospholipid acyl chains. Peptide antimicrobial activity generally increased with increasing depth of peptide insertion. The overall results, in conjunction with molecular modeling, support an initial electrostatic interaction step in which bacterial membranes attract and bind peptide dimers onto the bacterial surface, followed by the "sinking" of the hydrophobic core segment to a peptide sequence-dependent depth of approximately 2.5-8 A into the membrane, largely parallel to the membrane surface. Antimicrobial activity was likely enhanced by the fact that the peptide sequences contain AXXXA sequence motifs, which promote their dimerization, and possibly higher oligomerization, as assessed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel analysis and fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments. The high selectivity of these peptides for nonmammalian membranes, combined with their activity toward a wide spectrum of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and yeast, while retaining water solubility, represent significant advantages of this class of peptides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m507042200

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Glukhov, E., Stark, M., Burrows, L. L., & Deber, C. M.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
280
Issue
40
Pages
33960-33967
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971756197
Cited by
294
References
2
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Basis for Selectivity of Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides for Bacterial Versus Mammalian Membranes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m507042200
The paper
Glukhov, E., Stark, M., Burrows, L. L., & Deber, C. M. (2005). Basis for Selectivity of Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides for Bacterial Versus Mammalian Membranes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m507042200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.