The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Screening for the Preferred Substrate Sequence of Transglutaminase Using a Phage-displayed Peptide Library
Open accessAbstract
Mammalian transglutaminase (TGase) catalyzes covalent cross-linking of peptide-bound lysine residues or incorporation of primary amines to limited glutamine residues in substrate proteins. Using an unbiased M13 phage display random peptide library, we developed a screening system to elucidate primary structures surrounding reactive glutamine residue(s) that are preferred by TGase. Screening was performed by selecting phage clones expressing peptides that incorporated biotin-labeled primary amine by the catalytic reactions of TGase 2 and activated Factor XIII (Factor XIIIa). We identified several amino acid sequences that were preferred as glutamine donor substrates, most of which have a marked tendency for individual TGases: TGase 2, QxPphiD(P), QxPphi, and QxxphiDP; Factor XIIIa, QxxphixWP (where x and phi represent a non-conserved and a hydrophobic amino acid, respectively). We further confirmed that the sequences were favored for transamidation using modified glutathione S-transferase (GST) for recombinant peptide-GST fusion proteins. Most of the fusion proteins exhibited a considerable increase in incorporation of primary amines over that of modified GST alone. Furthermore, we identified the amino acid sequences that demonstrated higher specificity and inhibitory activity in the cross-linking reactions by TGase 2 and Factor XIIIa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cornified envelope: a model of cell death in the skin
Candi, E., Schmidt, R., & Melino, G. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1619 · Cited by 1,776
Cited by
Factor XIII: A Coagulation Factor With Multiple Plasmatic and Cellular Functions
Muszbek, L., Bereczky, Z., Bagoly, Z., Komáromi, I., & Katona, É. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00016.2010 · Cited by 493
Engström, N., Sandberg, A.-S., & Scheers, N. (2015) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu7042134 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Sugimura, Y., Hosono, M., Wada, F., Yoshimura, T., Maki, M., & Hitomi, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 281
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 17699-17706
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052011238
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for the Preferred Substrate Sequence of Transglutaminase Using a Phage-displayed Peptide Library. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m513538200
- The paper
- Sugimura, Y., Hosono, M., Wada, F., Yoshimura, T., Maki, M., & Hitomi, K. (2006). Screening for the Preferred Substrate Sequence of Transglutaminase Using a Phage-displayed Peptide Library. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m513538200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.