Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comparative Analysis of the Fibulin Protein Family

Open access
Kobayashi, Naoyuki, Kostka, Günter, Garbe, Jörg H.O., Keene, Douglas R., Bächinger, Hans Peter, Hanisch, Franz-Georg, Markova, Dessislava, Tsuda, Takeshi, Timpl, Rupert, Chu, Mon-Li, Sasaki, Takako·2007·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Fibulins are a family of five extracellular matrix proteins characterized by tandem arrays of epidermal growth factor-like domains and a C-terminal fibulin-type module. They are widely distributed and often associated with vasculature and elastic tissues. In this study, we expressed the three more recently identified family members, fibulin-3, fibulin-4, and fibulin-5, as recombinant proteins in mammalian cells. The purified proteins showed short rod structures of approximately 20 nm with a globule at one end, after rotary shadowing and electron microscopy. Two forms of mouse fibulin-3 were purified, and the O-glycan profiles of the larger form were characterized. Polyclonal antibodies raised against the purified proteins did not show any cross-reactivity with other family members and were used to assess the levels and localization of the fibulins in mouse tissues. Their binding interactions, cell adhesive properties, and tissue localization were analyzed in parallel with the previously characterized fibulin-1 and -2. Binding to tropoelastin was strong for fibulin-2 and -5, moderate for fibulin-4 and -1, and relatively weak for fibulin-3. Fibulin-4, but not fibulin-3 and -5, exhibited distinct interactions with collagen IV and nidogen-2 and moderate binding to the endostatin domain from collagen XV. Cell adhesive activities were not observed for all fibulins, except mouse fibulin-2, with various cell lines tested. All five fibulins were found in perichondrium and various regions of the lungs. Immunoelectron microscopy localized fibulin-4 and -5 to fibrillin microfibrils at distinct locations. Our studies suggest there are unique and redundant functions shared by these structurally related proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m611029200

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Kobayashi, N., Kostka, G., Garbe, J. H. O., Keene, D. R., Bächinger, H. P., Hanisch, F.-G., Markova, D., Tsuda, T., Timpl, R., Chu, M.-L., & Sasaki, T.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
282
Issue
16
Pages
11805-11816
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045371528
Cited by
270
References
3
FWCI
11.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparative Analysis of the Fibulin Protein Family. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m611029200
The paper
Kobayashi, N., Kostka, G., Garbe, J. H. O., Keene, D. R., Bächinger, H. P., Hanisch, F.-G., Markova, D., Tsuda, T., Timpl, R., Chu, M.-L., & Sasaki, T. (2007). A Comparative Analysis of the Fibulin Protein Family. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m611029200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.