Cited by 109Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The p21-activated Kinase 3 Implicated in Mental Retardation Regulates Spine Morphogenesis through a Cdc42-dependent Pathway

Open access
Kreis, Patricia, Thévenot, Emmanuel, Rousseau, Véronique, Boda, Bernadett, Muller, Dominique, Barnier, Jean-Vianney·2007·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The p21-activated kinase 3 (PAK3) is one of the recently identified genes for which mutations lead to nonsyndromic mental retardation. PAK3 is implicated in dendritic spine morphogenesis and is a key regulator of synaptic functions. However, the underlying roles of PAK3 in these processes remain poorly understood. We report here that the three mutations R419X, A365E, and R67C, responsible for mental retardation have different effects on the biological functions of PAK3. The R419X and A365E mutations completely abrogate the kinase activity. The R67C mutation drastically decreases the binding of PAK3 to the small GTPase Cdc42 and impairs its subsequent activation by this GTPase. We also report that PAK3 binds significantly more Cdc42 than Rac1 and is selectively activated by endogenous Cdc42, suggesting that PAK3 is a specific effector of Cdc42. Interestingly, the expression of the three mutated proteins in hippocampal neurons affects spinogenesis differentially. Both kinase-dead mutants slightly decrease the number of spines but profoundly alter spine morphology, whereas expression of the R67C mutant drastically decreases spine density. These results demonstrate that the Cdc42/PAK3 is a key module in dendritic spine formation and synaptic plasticity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m703298200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rock and Pak are two kinases that can be activated respectively by Rho and Cdc42.

    “Amongst known effectors of Rho and Cdc42, Rock and Pak are two kinases that can be activated repsectively by these GTPases24–26.”

    From Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines (2011) · cites this paper as [25]

    The section “R67C Mutation Impairs Kinase Activation by Cdc42” reports that PAK3 is activated by the intersectin–Cdc42 module, supporting the Pak–Cdc42 part of the claim. The passages found in our copy do not establish that ROCK is activated by Rho (searched: “ROCK” and “ROCK Rho kinase activated by Rho”). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Goslin, K., Asmussen, H., and Banker, G. (1998) Culturing Nerve Cells, 2nd Ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 339 -370

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kreis, P., Thévenot, E., Rousseau, V., Boda, B., Muller, D., & Barnier, J.-V.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Barnier, Jean-Vianney
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
282
Issue
29
Pages
21497-21506
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047838415
Cited by
109
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
PAK3, Cdc42, dendritic spine morphogenesis, intellectual disability, non-syndromic intellectual disability, small GTPases, kinase activity, Rac1, hippocampal neurons, synaptic plasticity, spine density
MeSH terms
Animals, Chlorocebus aethiops, Hippocampus, Intellectual Disability, Models, Biological, Mutation, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Synapses, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, COS Cells, cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein, rac1 GTP-Binding Protein, Rats, p21-Activated Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review