The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiple Reaction Monitoring to Identify Sites of Protein Phosphorylation with High Sensitivity
Open accessAbstract
Phosphorylation governs the activity of many proteins. Insight into molecular mechanisms in biology would be immensely improved by robust, sensitive methods for identifying precisely sites of phosphate addition. An approach to selective mapping of protein phosphorylation sites on a specific target protein of interest using LC-MS is described here. In this approach multiple reaction monitoring is used as an extremely sensitive MS survey scan for potential phosphopeptides from a known protein. This is automatically followed by peptide sequencing and subsequent location of the phosphorylation site; both of these steps occur in a single LC-MS run, providing greater efficiency of sample use. The method is capable of detecting and sequencing phosphopeptides at low femtomole levels with high selectivity. As proof of the value of this approach in an experimental setting, a key Schizosaccharomyces pombe cell cycle regulatory protein, Cyclin B, was purified, and associated proteins were identified. Phosphorylation sites on these proteins were located. The technique, which we have called multiple reaction monitoring-initiated detection and sequencing (MIDAS), is shown to be a highly sensitive approach to the determination of protein phosphorylation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Selected reaction monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions
Picotti, P., & Aebersold, R. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2015 · Cited by 1,302
Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins
Anderson, L., & Hunter, C. L. (2006) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m500331-mcp200 · Cited by 1,230
Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present
Bantscheff, M., Lemeer, S., Savitski, M. M., & Kuster, B. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6203-4 · Cited by 801
Kuzyk, M. A., Smith, D., Yang, J., Cross, T. J., Jackson, A. M., Hardie, D. B., Anderson, N. L., & Borchers, C. H. (2009) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m800540-mcp200 · Cited by 515
Interpreting the protein language using proteomics
Jensen, O. N. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1939 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Unwin, R. D., Griffiths, J. R., Leverentz, M. K., Grallert, A., Hagan, I. M., & Whetton, A. D.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1134-1144
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105192683
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Reaction Monitoring to Identify Sites of Protein Phosphorylation with High Sensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m500113-mcp200
- The paper
- Unwin, R. D., Griffiths, J. R., Leverentz, M. K., Grallert, A., Hagan, I. M., & Whetton, A. D. (2005). Multiple Reaction Monitoring to Identify Sites of Protein Phosphorylation with High Sensitivity. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m500113-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.