The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic Spectrum Quality Assessment and Iterative Computational Analysis of Shotgun Proteomic Data
Open accessAbstract
In mass spectrometry-based proteomics, frequently hundreds of thousands of MS/MS spectra are collected in a single experiment. Of these, a relatively small fraction is confidently assigned to peptide sequences, whereas the majority of the spectra are not further analyzed. Spectra are not assigned to peptides for diverse reasons. These include deficiencies of the scoring schemes implemented in the database search tools, sequence variations (e.g. single nucleotide polymorphisms) or omissions in the database searched, post-translational or chemical modifications of the peptide analyzed, or the observation of sequences that are not anticipated from the genomic sequence (e.g. splice forms, somatic rearrangement, and processed proteins). To increase the amount of information that can be extracted from proteomic MS/MS datasets we developed a robust method that detects high quality spectra within the fraction of spectra unassigned by conventional sequence database searching and computes a quality score for each spectrum. We also demonstrate that iterative search strategies applied to such detected unassigned high quality spectra significantly increase the number of spectra that can be assigned from datasets and that biologically interesting new insights can be gained from existing data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Self-citationInterpretation of Shotgun Proteomic Data
Nesvizhskii, A. I., & Aebersold, R. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r500012-mcp200 · Cited by 1,025
Self-citation
Cited by
Desiere, F. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj040 · Cited by 910
High-confidence structural annotation of metabolites absent from spectral libraries
Hoffmann, M. A., Nothias, L.-F., Ludwig, M., Fleischauer, M., Gentry, E. C., Witting, M., Dorrestein, P. C., Dührkop, K., & Böcker, S. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01045-9 · Cited by 388
Identification of tumor antigens with immunopeptidomics
Chong, C., Coukos, G., & Bassani-Sternberg, M. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01038-8 · Cited by 232
neXtProt: Organizing Protein Knowledge in the Context of Human Proteome Projects
Gaudet, P., Argoud-Puy, G., Cusin, I., Duek, P., Evalet, O., Gateau, A., Gleizes, A., Pereira, M., Zahn-Zabal, M., Zwahlen, C., et al. (2013) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr300830v · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Nesvizhskii, A. I., Roos, F. F., Grossmann, J., Vogelzang, M., Eddes, J. S., Gruissem, W., Baginsky, S., & Aebersold, R.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 652-670
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007176869
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Spectrum Quality Assessment and Iterative Computational Analysis of Shotgun Proteomic Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m500319-mcp200
- The paper
- Nesvizhskii, A. I., Roos, F. F., Grossmann, J., Vogelzang, M., Eddes, J. S., Gruissem, W., Baginsky, S., & Aebersold, R. (2006). Dynamic Spectrum Quality Assessment and Iterative Computational Analysis of Shotgun Proteomic Data. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m500319-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.