The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proteomics of Plant Detergent-resistant Membranes
Open accessAbstract
A large body of evidence from the past decade supports the existence, in membrane from animal and yeast cells, of functional microdomains that play important roles in protein sorting, signal transduction, or infection by pathogens. Recent reports demonstrated the presence, in plants, of detergent-resistant fractions isolated from plasma membrane. Analysis of the lipidic composition of this fraction revealed its enrichment in sphingolipids and sterols and depletion in phospho- and glycerolipids as previously observed for animal microdomains. One-dimensional gel electrophoresis experiments indicated that these detergent-resistant fractions are able to recruit a specific set of plasma membrane proteins and exclude others. In the present study, we used mass spectrometry to give an extensive description of a tobacco plasma membrane fraction resistant to solubilization with Triton X-100. This led to the identification of 145 proteins whose functional and physicochemical characteristics were analyzed in silico. Parameters such as isoelectric point, molecular weight, number and length of transmembrane segments, or global hydrophobicity were analyzed and compared with the data available concerning plant plasma membrane proteins. Post-translational modifications, such as myristoylation, palmitoylation, or presence of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor, were examined in relation to the presence of the corresponding proteins in these microdomains. From a functional point of view, this analysis indicated that if a primary function of the plasma membrane, such as transport, seems under-represented in the detergent-resistant fraction, others undergo a significant increase of their relative importance. Among these are signaling and response to biotic and abiotic stress, cellular trafficking, and cell wall metabolism. This suggests that these domains are likely to constitute, as in animal cells, signaling platforms involved in these physiological functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional rafts in cell membranes
Simons, K., & Ikonen, E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42408 · Cited by 9,757
Cited by
Maurel, C., Boursiac, Y., Luu, D.-T., Santoni, V., Shahzad, Z., & Verdoucq, L. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2015 · Cited by 940
The Cell Biology of Cellulose Synthesis
McFarlane, H. E., Döring, A., & Persson, S. (2014) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040240 · Cited by 623
Desprez, T., Juraniec, M., Crowell, E. F., Jouy, H., Pochylova, Z., Parcy, F., Höfte, H., Gonneau, M., & Vernhettes, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706569104 · Cited by 616
Titapiwatanakun, B., & Murphy, A. S. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ern240 · Cited by 156
Pasrija, R., Panwar, S. L., & Prasad, R. (2008) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00861-07 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Morel, J., Claverol, S., Mongrand, S., Furt, F., Fromentin, J., Bessoule, J.-J., Blein, J.-P., & Simon-Plas, F.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1396-1411
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106974154
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomics of Plant Detergent-resistant Membranes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m600044-mcp200
- The paper
- Morel, J., Claverol, S., Mongrand, S., Furt, F., Fromentin, J., Bessoule, J.-J., Blein, J.-P., & Simon-Plas, F. (2006). Proteomics of Plant Detergent-resistant Membranes. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m600044-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.