The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anti-infection Peptidomics of Amphibian Skin
Open accessAbstract
Peptidomics and genomics analyses were used to study an anti-infection array of peptides of amphibian skin. 372 cDNA sequences of antimicrobial peptides were characterized from a single individual skin of the frog Odorrana grahami that encode 107 novel antimicrobial peptides. This contribution almost triples the number of currently reported amphibian antimicrobial peptides. The peptides could be organized into 30 divergent groups, including 24 novel groups. The diversity in peptide coding cDNA sequences is, to our knowledge, the most extreme yet described for any animal. The patterns of diversification suggest that point mutations as well as insertion, deletion, and "shuffling" of oligonucleotide sequences were responsible for the diversity. The diversity of antimicrobial peptides may have resulted from the diversity of microorganisms. These diverse peptides exhibited both diverse secondary structure and "host defense" properties. Such extreme antimicrobial peptide diversity in a single amphibian species is amazing. This has led us to reconsider the strong capability of innate immunity and molecular genetics of amphibian ecological diversification and doubt the general opinion that 20-30 different antimicrobial peptides can protect an animal because of the relatively wide specificity of the peptide antibiotics. The antimicrobial mechanisms of O. grahami peptides were investigated. They exerted their antimicrobial functions by various means, including forming lamellar mesosome-like structures, peeling off the cell walls, forming pores, and inducing DNA condensation. With respect to the development of antibiotics, these peptides provide potential new templates to explore further.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms
Zasloff, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415389a · Cited by 8,457
Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?
Brogden, K. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1098 · Cited by 5,829
Cited by
Agrawal, M., Saraf, S., Saraf, S., Antimisiaris, S. G., Chougule, M. B., Shoyele, S. A., & Alexander, A. (2018) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.011 · Cited by 630
Antioxidant Peptidomics Reveals Novel Skin Antioxidant System
Yang, H., Wang, X., Liu, X., Wu, J., Liu, C., Gong, W., Zhao, Z., Hong, J., Lin, D., Wang, Y., et al. (2009) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m800297-mcp200 · Cited by 156
Self-citationAmphibian antimicrobial peptides and Protozoa: Lessons from parasites
Rivas, L., Luque-Ortega, J. R., & Andreu, D. (2009) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.11.002 · Cited by 121
Frog Skins Keep Redox Homeostasis by Antioxidant Peptides with Rapid Radical Scavenging Ability
Liu, C., Hong, J., Yang, H., Wu, J., Ma, D., Li, D., Lin, D., & Lai, R. (2010) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.01.036 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Xu, X., Xu, C., Zhou, W., Zhang, K., Yu, H., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Rees, H. H., Lai, R., Yang, D., & Wu, J.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 882-894
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123106599
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti-infection Peptidomics of Amphibian Skin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m600334-mcp200
- The paper
- Li, J., Xu, X., Xu, C., Zhou, W., Zhang, K., Yu, H., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Rees, H. H., Lai, R., Yang, D., & Wu, J. (2007). Anti-infection Peptidomics of Amphibian Skin. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m600334-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.