The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Proteomic Study of the Response to Salinity and Drought Stress in an Introgression Strain of Bread Wheat
Open accessAbstract
The effect of drought and salinity stress on the seedlings of the somatic hybrid wheat cv. Shanrong No. 3 (SR3) and its parent bread wheat cv. Jinan 177 (JN177) was investigated using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Of a set of 93 (root) and 65 (leaf) differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), 34 (root) and six (leaf) DEPs were cultivar-specific. The remaining DEPs were salinity/drought stress-responsive but not cultivar-specific. Many of the DEPs were expressed under both drought and salinity stresses. The amounts of stress-responsive DEPs between SR3 and JN177 were almost equivalent, whereas only some of these DEPs were shared by the two cultivars. Overall, the number of salinity-responsive DEPs was greater than the number of drought-responsive DEPs. And most of the drought-responsive DEPs also responded to salinity. There are both similarities and differences in the responses of wheat to salinity and drought. A parallel transcriptomics analysis showed that the correlation between transcriptional and translational patterns of DEPs was poor. The enhanced drought/salinity tolerance of SR3 appears to be governed by a superior capacity for osmotic and ionic homeostasis, a more efficient removal of toxic by-products, and ultimately a better potential for growth recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
Cited by
ROS homeostasis in halophytes in the context of salinity stress tolerance
Bose, J., Rodrigo-Moreno, A., & Shabala, S. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ert430 · Cited by 963
Mechanisms of Plant Salt Response: Insights from Proteomics
Zhang, H., Han, B., Wang, T., Chen, S., Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Dai, S. (2012) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr200861w · Cited by 377
Plant Abiotic Stress Proteomics: The Major Factors Determining Alterations in Cellular Proteome
Kosová, K., Vítámvás, P., Urban, M. O., Prášil, I. T., & Renaut, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00122 · Cited by 375
Abiotic stress responses in plant roots: a proteomics perspective
Ghosh, D., & Xu, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00006 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, Z., Wang, M., Li, F., Lv, H., Li, C., & Xia, G.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2676-2686
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148458134
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Proteomic Study of the Response to Salinity and Drought Stress in an Introgression Strain of Bread Wheat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m900052-mcp200
- The paper
- Peng, Z., Wang, M., Li, F., Lv, H., Li, C., & Xia, G. (2009). A Proteomic Study of the Response to Salinity and Drought Stress in an Introgression Strain of Bread Wheat. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m900052-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
