Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immunoaffinity Enrichment and Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Protein Methylation

Open access
Guo, Ailan, Gu, Hongbo, Zhou, Jing, Mulhern, Daniel, Wang, Yi, Lee, Kimberly A., Yang, Vicky, Aguiar, Mike, Kornhauser, Jon, Jia, Xiaoying, Ren, Jianmin, Beausoleil, Sean A., Silva, Jeffrey C., Vemulapalli, Vidyasiri, Bedford, Mark T., Comb, Michael J.·2014·Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Abstract

Protein methylation is a common posttranslational modification that mostly occurs on arginine and lysine residues. Arginine methylation has been reported to regulate RNA processing, gene transcription, DNA damage repair, protein translocation, and signal transduction. Lysine methylation is best known to regulate histone function and is involved in epigenetic regulation of gene transcription. To better study protein methylation, we have developed highly specific antibodies against monomethyl arginine; asymmetric dimethyl arginine; and monomethyl, dimethyl, and trimethyl lysine motifs. These antibodies were used to perform immunoaffinity purification of methyl peptides followed by LC-MS/MS analysis to identify and quantify arginine and lysine methylation sites in several model studies. Overall, we identified over 1000 arginine methylation sites in human cell line and mouse tissues, and ∼160 lysine methylation sites in human cell line HCT116. The number of methylation sites identified in this study exceeds those found in the literature to date. Detailed analysis of arginine-methylated proteins observed in mouse brain compared with those found in mouse embryo shows a tissue-specific distribution of arginine methylation, and extends the types of proteins that are known to be arginine methylated to include many new protein types. Many arginine-methylated proteins that we identified from the brain, including receptors, ion channels, transporters, and vesicle proteins, are involved in synaptic transmission, whereas the most abundant methylated proteins identified from mouse embryo are transcriptional regulators and RNA processing proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/mcp.o113.027870

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
Guo, A., Gu, H., Zhou, J., Mulhern, D., Wang, Y., Lee, K. A., Yang, V., Aguiar, M., Kornhauser, J., Jia, X., Ren, J., Beausoleil, S. A., Silva, J. C., Vemulapalli, V., Bedford, M. T., & Comb, M. J.
Venue
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
372-387
ISSN
1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151026975
Cited by
474
References
58
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunoaffinity Enrichment and Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Protein Methylation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.o113.027870
The paper
Guo, A., Gu, H., Zhou, J., Mulhern, D., Wang, Y., Lee, K. A., Yang, V., Aguiar, M., Kornhauser, J., Jia, X., Ren, J., Beausoleil, S. A., Silva, J. C., Vemulapalli, V., Bedford, M. T., & Comb, M. J. (2014). Immunoaffinity Enrichment and Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Protein Methylation. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.o113.027870

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.