Cited by 196Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications

Multibatch TMT reveals false positives, batch effects and missing values

Open access
Brenes, Alejandro, Hukelmann, Jens, Bensaddek, Dalila, Lamond, Angus I.·2019·Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Abstract

Multiplexing strategies for large-scale proteomic analyses have become increasingly prevalent, tandem mass tags (TMT) in particular. Here we used a large iPSC proteomic experiment with twenty-four 10-plex TMT batches to evaluate the effect of integrating multiple TMT batches within a single analysis. We identified a significant inflation rate of protein missing values as multiple batches are integrated and show that this pattern is aggravated at the peptide level. We also show that without normalization strategies to address the batch effects, the high precision of quantitation within a single multiplexed TMT batch is not reproduced when data from multiple TMT batches are integrated.Further, the incidence of false positives was studied by using Y chromosome peptides as an internal control. The iPSC lines quantified in this data set were derived from both male and female donors, hence the peptides mapped to the Y chromosome should be absent from female lines. Nonetheless, these Y chromosome-specific peptides were consistently detected in the female channels of all TMT batches. We then used the same Y chromosome specific peptides to quantify the level of ion coisolation as well as the effect of primary and secondary reporter ion interference. These results were used to propose solutions to mitigate the limitations of multi-batch TMT analyses. We confirm that including a common reference line in every batch increases precision by facilitating normalization across the batches and we propose experimental designs that minimize the effect of cross population reporter ion interference.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/mcp.ra119.001472

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brenes, A., Hukelmann, J., Bensaddek, D., & Lamond, A. I.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Lamond, Angus I.
Venue
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
1967-1980
ISSN
1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963597305
Cited by
196
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UK Research and Innovation | Medical Research Council (098503/E/12/Z)
  • Wellcome Trust (098503/E/12/Z, 073980/Z/03/Z, 105024/Z/14/Z)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Keywords
tandem mass tags, batch effects, false positives, induced pluripotent stem cells, data normalization, peptide quantification, multiplexed proteomics
MeSH terms
Cells, Cultured, Chromatography, Liquid, Female, Humans, Male, Peptides, Reproducibility of Results, Proteomics, Chromosomes, Human, Y, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review