The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large-scale Analysis of in Vivo Phosphorylated Membrane Proteins by Immobilized Metal Ion Affinity Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
Global analyses of protein phosphorylation require specific enrichment methods because of the typically low abundance of phosphoproteins. To date, immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) for phosphopeptides has shown great promise for large-scale studies, but has a reputation for poor specificity. We investigated the potential of IMAC in combination with capillary liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry for the identification of plasma membrane phosphoproteins of Arabidopsis. Without chemical modification of peptides, over 75% pure phosphopeptides were isolated from plasma membrane digests and detected and sequenced by mass spectrometry. We present a scheme for two-dimensional peptide separation using strong anion exchange chromatography prior to IMAC that both decreases the complexity of IMAC-purified phosphopeptides and yields a far greater coverage of monophosphorylated peptides. Among the identified sequences, six originated from different isoforms of the plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase and defined two previously unknown phosphorylation sites at the regulatory C terminus. The potential for large-scale identification of phosphorylation sites on plasma membrane proteins will have wide-ranging implications for research in signal transduction, cell-cell communication, and membrane transport processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ong, S.-E., Blagoev, B., Kratchmarova, I., Kristensen, D. B., Steen, H., Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m200025-mcp200 · Cited by 5,574
Cited by
Beausoleil, S. A., Villén, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., & Gygi, S. P. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1240 · Cited by 1,577
Phosphoproteomics of the Arabidopsis Plasma Membrane and a New Phosphorylation Site Database[W]
Nühse, T. S., Stensballe, A., Jensen, O. N., & Peck, S. C. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.104.023150 · Cited by 478
Self-citationSugiyama, N., Masuda, T., Shinoda, K., Nakamura, A., Tomita, M., & Ishihama, Y. (2007) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.t600060-mcp200 · Cited by 435
Zhao, Y., & Jensen, O. N. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200900398 · Cited by 384
Self-citationMerlot, S., Leonhardt, N., Fenzi, F., Valon, C., Costa, M., Piette, L., Vavasseur, A., Genty, B., Boivin, K., Müller, A., et al. (2007) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601750 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Nühse, T. S., Stensballe, A., Jensen, O. N., & Peck, S. C.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1234-1243
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155880596
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-scale Analysis of in Vivo Phosphorylated Membrane Proteins by Immobilized Metal Ion Affinity Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.t300006-mcp200
- The paper
- Nühse, T. S., Stensballe, A., Jensen, O. N., & Peck, S. C. (2003). Large-scale Analysis of in Vivo Phosphorylated Membrane Proteins by Immobilized Metal Ion Affinity Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.t300006-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.