The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The action turn: Toward a transformational social science
Abstract
We offer an epistemological basis for action research, in order to increase the validity, the practical significance, and the transformational potential of social science. We start by outlining some of the paradigmatic issues which underlie action research, arguing for a “turn to action” which will complement the linguistic turn in the social sciences. Four key dimensions of an action science are discussed: the primacy of the practical, the centrality of participation, the requirement for experiential grounding, and the importance of normative, analogical theory. Three broad strategies for action research are suggested: first-person research/practice addresses the ability of a person to foster an inquiring approach to his or her own life; second-person research/practice engages a face-to-face group in collaborative inquiry; third-person research/practice asks how we can establish inquiring communities which reach beyond the immediate group to engage with whole organizations, communities and countries. The article argues that a transformational science needs to integrate first- second- and third-person voices in ways that increase the validity of the knowledge we use in our moment-to-moment living, that increase the effectiveness of our actions in real-time, and that remain open to unexpected transformation when our taken-for-granted assumptions, strategies, and habits are appropriately challenged. Illustrative references to studies that begin to speak to these questions are offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Fertile Obsession: Validity After Poststructuralism
Lather, P. (1993) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00112.x · Cited by 937 · cited 1×
“For example, Lather (1993) suggests that social scientists committed to conducting, reporting, and encouraging first-person research/practice develop situated validity, rhizomatic validity, reflexive validity, and ironic validity.”
BackgroundElectrophysiological Correlates of Higher States of Consciousness During Sleep in Long-Term
Mason, L. I., Alexander, C. N., Travis, F. T., Marsh, G., Orme-Johnson, D. W., Gackenbach, J., Mason, D. C., Rainforth, M., & Walton, K. G. (1997) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/20.2.102 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Trajber, R., Walker, C., Marchezini, V., Kraftl, P., Olivato, D., Hadfield-Hill, S., Zara, C., & Fernandes Monteiro, S. (2019) · Action Research · doi:10.1177/1476750319829202 · Cited by 77
Action research and residential waste minimisation in Palmerston North, New Zealand
Farrelly, T., & Tucker, C. (2014) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.003 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Reason, P., & Torbert, W.
- Venue
- Concepts and Transformation
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2001-09-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-37
- ISSN
- 1384-6639 (ISSN-L)
- 1569-9692
- OpenAlex
- W2030052066
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The action turn: Toward a transformational social science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/cat.6.1.02rea
- The paper
- Reason, P., & Torbert, W. (2001). The action turn: Toward a transformational social science. Concepts and Transformation. https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.6.1.02rea
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.