The DOI matches its Crossref record.
(Mis)Representing Islam: The racism and rhetoric of British broadsheet newspapers
Abstract
(Mis)Representing Islam explores and illustrates how élite broadsheet newspapers are implicated in the production and reproduction of anti-Muslim racism. The book approaches journalistic discourse as the inseparable combination of ‘social practices’, ‘discursive practices’ and the ‘texts’ themselves from a perspective which fuses Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) with Edward Said’s critique of Orientalism. This framework enables Richardson to (re)contextualise élite journalism within its professional, political, economic, social and historic settings and present a critical and precise examination of not only the prevalence but also the form and potential effects of anti-Muslim racism. The book analyses the centrality of van Dijk’s ideological square and the significance and utility of stereotypical topoi in representing Islam and Muslims, focusing in particular on the reporting of Turkey, Pakistan, Iran, Israel/Palestine, Algeria, Iraq and Britain. This timely book should interest researchers and students of racism, Islam, Journalism and Communication studies, Rhetoric, and (Critical) Discourse Analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015) · The Handbook of Discourse Analysis · doi:10.1002/9781118584194.ch22 · Cited by 5,485
Different groups, different threats: public attitudes towards immigrants
Hellwig, T., & Sinno, A. (2017) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2016.1202749 · Cited by 285
Baker, P., & Potts, A. (2013) · Critical Discourse Studies · doi:10.1080/17405904.2012.744320 · Cited by 135
Borell, K. (2015) · Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations · doi:10.1080/09596410.2015.1067063 · Cited by 49
Contesting #StopIslam: The Dynamics of a Counter-narrative Against Right-wing Populism
Poole, E., Giraud, E., & de Quincey, E. (2019) · Open Library of Humanities · doi:10.16995/olh.406 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, J.
- Venue
- Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2004-01-29
- ISSN
- 1569-9463 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4239887144
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
