Cited by 49Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceMedia Discourse and Social AnalysisSocial and Intergroup Psychology

When Is the Time to Hate? A Research Review on the Impact of Dramatic Events on Islamophobia and Islamophobic Hate Crimes in Europe

Borell, Klas·2015·Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations

Abstract

Social scientists have long been interested in the significance of unexpected, dramatic events for social change. However, when it comes to research on prejudice and hate crimes, the impact of sudden, dramatic events has been little considered. The purpose of this research review is to survey European data to elucidate the temporal links between unexpected events, prejudice, and hate crimes, and also to pinpoint some of the methodological problems faced by scholars studying the impact of unanticipated dramatic events on prejudice and hate crimes; the significance of unexpected events often leaves researchers without access to relevant baseline data. The studies of Islamophobia and Islamophobic hate crimes considered in the present article privilege a dynamic view of time: terrorist attacks instill a sense of uncertainty and risk and Islamophobia and hate crimes are to a large extent event-driven and reactive, and tend to flare up on the heels of dramatic events. The recent attention paid to the role of unexpected, dramatic events represents a new and very promising approach to the study of prejudice and hate crimes; with the earlier, essentially spatial research focus now complemented by a temporal focus, the chances increase of charting the underlying dynamics and causes of prejudice and hate crimes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09596410.2015.1067063

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • La circunstancia de que el ataque de Algeciras fuera cometido por un migrante musulmán marroquí con orden de expulsión pendiente puede haber intensificado los debates en torno a la inmigración musulmana, alimentando discursos de islamofobia y racismo similares a los observados tras otros atentados atribuidos al extremismo islámico.

    “Esta circunstancia puede haber intensificado los debates en torno a la inmigración musulmana, alimentando discursos de islamofobia y racismo similares a los observados tras otros atentados atribuidos al extremismo islámico (Borell, 2015;Duman & Unur, 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Borell, K.
Affiliations
Jönköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Borell, Klas
Venue
Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations
Published
2015-07-17
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
409-421
ISSN
  • 0959-6410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9311
OpenAlex
W2178153673
Cited by
49
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Discourse and Social Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
Islamophobia, dramatic events, terrorist attacks, prejudice, risk and uncertainty, Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review