When Is the Time to Hate? A Research Review on the Impact of Dramatic Events on Islamophobia and Islamophobic Hate Crimes in Europe
Abstract
Social scientists have long been interested in the significance of unexpected, dramatic events for social change. However, when it comes to research on prejudice and hate crimes, the impact of sudden, dramatic events has been little considered. The purpose of this research review is to survey European data to elucidate the temporal links between unexpected events, prejudice, and hate crimes, and also to pinpoint some of the methodological problems faced by scholars studying the impact of unanticipated dramatic events on prejudice and hate crimes; the significance of unexpected events often leaves researchers without access to relevant baseline data. The studies of Islamophobia and Islamophobic hate crimes considered in the present article privilege a dynamic view of time: terrorist attacks instill a sense of uncertainty and risk and Islamophobia and hate crimes are to a large extent event-driven and reactive, and tend to flare up on the heels of dramatic events. The recent attention paid to the role of unexpected, dramatic events represents a new and very promising approach to the study of prejudice and hate crimes; with the earlier, essentially spatial research focus now complemented by a temporal focus, the chances increase of charting the underlying dynamics and causes of prejudice and hate crimes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
La circunstancia de que el ataque de Algeciras fuera cometido por un migrante musulmán marroquí con orden de expulsión pendiente puede haber intensificado los debates en torno a la inmigración musulmana, alimentando discursos de islamofobia y racismo similares a los observados tras otros atentados atribuidos al extremismo islámico.
“Esta circunstancia puede haber intensificado los debates en torno a la inmigración musulmana, alimentando discursos de islamofobia y racismo similares a los observados tras otros atentados atribuidos al extremismo islámico (Borell, 2015;Duman & Unur, 2020).”
From Redes de odio y contranarrativas en Twitter sobre el ataque a iglesias católicas en Algeciras: Dinámicas de conectividad, influencia y polarización (2026) · cites this paper as Borell, 2015
Cites
Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4 · Cited by 1,588 · see citing works
How terrorism news reports increase prejudice against outgroups: A terror management account
Das, E., Bushman, B. J., Bezemer, M. D., Kerkhof, P., & Vermeulen, I. E. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.001 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Neria, Y., DiGrande, L., & Adams, B. G. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0024791 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rebollo Diaz, C. (2026) · Redes. Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales · doi:10.5565/rev/redes.1130
- Authors
- Borell, K.
- Affiliations
- Jönköping University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Borell, Klas
- ORCID
- Borell, Klas
- Venue
- Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-07-17
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 409-421
- ISSN
- 0959-6410 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9311
- OpenAlex
- W2178153673
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Discourse and Social Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- Islamophobia, dramatic events, terrorist attacks, prejudice, risk and uncertainty, Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review