Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 532

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments

Open access
Goodwin, Charles, Goodwin, Marjorie Harness·2022·IPrA Papers in Pragmatics

Abstract

The analysis of conversation has a strong relevance to the study of pragmatics.Thus in introducing the scope of pragmatics Levinson (1983: 284) notes that It is not hard to see why one should look to conversation for insight into pragmatic phenomena, for conversation is clearly the prototypical kind of language usage, the form in which we are all first exposed to language the matrix for language acquisition.The field of study that has provided the most extensive analysis of the pragmatic organization of conversation is the line of inquiry initiated by the late Harvey Sacks and his colleagues.lIndeed * We are very deeply indebted to Alessandro Duranti, William Hanks, Gail Jefferson and Emanuel Schegloff for insightful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this analysis.This paper was initially presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, September 9, 1982.l.For a detailed study of both work in conversation analysis, and how that work is relevant to pragmatics in general, see Levinson (1983).See Heritage (l98 a) for more extensive treatment of the relationship between conversation analysis and the ethnomethodological tradition it emerged from within sociology, and Heritage (1985) for a detailed summary of work within the field.For collections of specific analysis see for example Atkinson and Heritage (1984), Button and Lee (in press), Schenkein (1978), and Zimmerman and West (1980).C. Goodwin (1981) and Heath (1986) examine in detail the IPRA Papers in Pragntatics l, No.l (1987), l-54

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 532

Metadata

Authors
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H.
Venue
IPrA Papers in Pragmatics
Published
2022-07-05
Pages
1-54
ISSN
  • 2406-419X (ISSN-L)
  • 2406-4246
OpenAlex
W2079321623
Cited by
532
References
27
FWCI
361.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo
The paper
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (2022). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.