The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments
Open accessAbstract
The analysis of conversation has a strong relevance to the study of pragmatics.Thus in introducing the scope of pragmatics Levinson (1983: 284) notes that It is not hard to see why one should look to conversation for insight into pragmatic phenomena, for conversation is clearly the prototypical kind of language usage, the form in which we are all first exposed to language the matrix for language acquisition.The field of study that has provided the most extensive analysis of the pragmatic organization of conversation is the line of inquiry initiated by the late Harvey Sacks and his colleagues.lIndeed * We are very deeply indebted to Alessandro Duranti, William Hanks, Gail Jefferson and Emanuel Schegloff for insightful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this analysis.This paper was initially presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, September 9, 1982.l.For a detailed study of both work in conversation analysis, and how that work is relevant to pragmatics in general, see Levinson (1983).See Heritage (l98 a) for more extensive treatment of the relationship between conversation analysis and the ethnomethodological tradition it emerged from within sociology, and Heritage (1985) for a detailed summary of work within the field.For collections of specific analysis see for example Atkinson and Heritage (1984), Button and Lee (in press), Schenkein (1978), and Zimmerman and West (1980).C. Goodwin (1981) and Heath (1986) examine in detail the IPRA Papers in Pragntatics l, No.l (1987), l-54
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,445
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Levinson, S. C. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813313 · Cited by 5,137
(1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665868 · Cited by 4,133
Constraints on variables in syntax
Ross, J. R. (1967) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 4,102
Sequencing in Conversational Openings1
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (1968) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 · Cited by 2,448
Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers
Goodwin, C. (1981) · Cited by 2,305
Self-citationGarfinkel and Ethnomethodology
Adler, P., du Gay, P., Morgan, G., Reed, M., & Llewellyn, N. (2014) · The Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory, and Organization Studies · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199671083.013.0013 · Cited by 2,259
The Intonation of American English
Wells, R. S., & Pike, K. L. (1947) · Language · doi:10.2307/409880 · Cited by 1,402
The transformation of experience in narrative syntax
Labov, W. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,183
Cited by
Action and embodiment within situated human interaction
Goodwin, C. (2000) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00096-x · Cited by 3,073
Self-citationEpistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge
Heritage, J. (2012) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 · Cited by 1,639
Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (2000) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500001019 · Cited by 1,163
The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis
Firth, A. (1996) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(96)00014-8 · Cited by 1,074
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351810903471258 · Cited by 850
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H.
- Venue
- IPrA Papers in Pragmatics
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2022-07-05
- Pages
- 1-54
- ISSN
- 2406-419X (ISSN-L)
- 2406-4246
- OpenAlex
- W2079321623
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 361.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo
- The paper
- Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (2022). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.