Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 850

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mobilizing Response

Open access
Stivers, Tanya, Rossano, Federico·2010·Research on Language and Social Interaction

Abstract

A fundamental puzzle in the organization of social interaction concerns how one individual elicits a response from another. This article asks what it is about some sequentially initial turns that reliably mobilizes a coparticipant to respond and under what circumstances individuals are accountable for producing a response. Whereas a linguistic approach suggests that this is what “questions” (more generally) and interrogativity (more narrowly) are for, a sociological approach to social interaction suggests that the social action a person is implementing mobilizes a recipient's response. We find that although both theories have merit, neither adequately solves the puzzle. We argue instead that different actions mobilize response to different degrees. Speakers then design their turns to perform actions, and with particular response-mobilizing features of turn-design speakers can hold recipients more accountable for responding or not. This model of response relevance allows sequential position, action, and turn design to each contribute to response relevance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08351810903471258

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bertinetto , P. M. and Caldognetto , E. 1993 . “ Ritmo e intonazione ” . In Introduzione all' Italiano contemporaneo [Introduction to contemporary Italian , Edited by: Sobrero , A. A. 141 – 192 . Bari, , Italy : Laterza .
  2. Bussman , H. 1996 . Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics , London : Routledge .
  3. Haan , J. 2002 . Speaking of questions: An exploration of Dutch question intonation , Utrecht, , The Netherlands : LOT .
  4. Heritage , J. 2002 . “ Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement ” . In The language of turn and sequence , Edited by: Ford , C. , Fox , B. and Thompson , S. 196 – 224 . Oxford, , England : Oxford University Press . · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0008
  5. Jefferson , G. 1981 . The abominable “ne?”: A working paper exploring the phenomenon of post-response pursuit of response (Occasional Paper No.6) , Manchester, , England : University of Manchester, Department of Sociology .
  6. 10.2307/800595 · doi:10.2307/800595
  7. Kori , S. and Farnetani , E. 1983 . Acoustic manifestation of focus in Italian . Quaderni del Centro di Studio per le Ricerche di Fonetica , 2 : 323 – 328 .
  8. Ladd , D. R. 1980 . The structure of intonational meaning , Bloomington, IN : Indiana University Press .
  9. Pierrehumbert , J. 1980 . The phonology and phonetics of English intonation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) , Cambridge, MA : Massachusetts Institute of Technology .
  10. Pomerantz , A. 1984b . “ Pursuing a response ” . In Structures of social action , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 152 – 164 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
  11. 10.2307/1519752 · doi:10.2307/1519752 · Paper page
  12. Rossano , F. . When it's over is it really over? On the effects of sustained gaze vs. gaze withdrawal at sequence possible completion . Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Association . Riva del Garda, Italy. July ,
  13. Rossano , F. . When the eyes meet: Using gaze to mobilize response . Paper presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis . Helsinki, Finland. May ,
  14. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Sadock , J. and Zwicky , A. 1985 . “ Speech act distinctions in syntax ” . In Language typology and syntactic description , Edited by: Shopen , T. Vol. 1 , 155 – 196 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
  16. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041 · doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041 · Paper page
  17. Searle , J. R. 1975 . “ Indirect speech acts ” . In Syntax and semantics , Edited by: Cole , P. and Morgan , J. L. Vol. 3 , 59 – 82 . New York, NY : Academic Press .

Cited by

See all 850

Metadata

Authors
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F.
Venue
Research on Language and Social Interaction
Published
2010-02-12
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
3-31
ISSN
  • 0835-1813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7973
OpenAlex
W4238586864
Cited by
850
References
38
FWCI
132.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mobilizing Response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08351810903471258
The paper
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing Response. Research on Language and Social Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.