The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension at an intermediate level in English and French as foreign languages: An approximate replication study of Stæhr (2009)
Abstract
The present study aims to replicate Stæhr’s (2009) study on the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension. To explore the generalizability of Stæhr’s findings, two experiments were conducted. However, the study changed the population (Flemish learners) and proficiency level of the materials in the first experiment (intermediate) and also the language in the second experiment (French). Our results generally confirm Stæhr’s findings. We also found a positive correlation between vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension. Although our findings reveal that learners probably need fewer words for adequate listening comprehension at an intermediate proficiency level, our study also showed that learners who knew more words had higher listening comprehension scores. Finally, our study seems to suggest that learners might need less lexical coverage for intermediate listening.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As research shows that 90% lexical coverage (known words in a text) is likely to be enough for listening/viewing comprehension of informal texts (Durbahn et al., 2020;Noreillie et al., 2018;Van Zeeland & Schmitt, 2012)”
From The effects of captions on L2 learners’ comprehension of vlogs (2021) · cites this paper as Noreillie et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ams074 · Cited by 457
Second Language Lexical Knowledge and Listening Comprehension
Bonk, W. J. (2000) · International Journal of Listening · doi:10.1080/10904018.2000.10499033 · Cited by 206
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1093/applin/24.4.425 · DOI · Paper page
- Cobb, Compleat lexical tutor
- Council of Europe, 2001, Common European framework of reference for languages; Learning, teaching, assessment
- 10.1016/j.esp.2013.08.001 · DOI
- Davies, 2008, Corpus of Contemporary American English
- European Commission, 2012, The European survey on language competences
- 10.1177/0265532212459028 · DOI
- 10.1075/itl.00008.lau · DOI
- 10.1080/15434303.2016.1210611 · DOI
- Londsdale, 2009, A frequency dictionary of French core vocabulary for learners, 10.4324/9780203883044 · DOI
- Milton, 2009, Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition, 10.21832/9781847692092 · DOI
- 10.1353/cml.2006.0049 · DOI · Paper page
- Peters, 2015,, A post-entry English and French vocabulary size for Flemish learners
- 10.1111/modl.12335 · DOI
- Porte, 2012, Introduction, 1
- 10.1177/026553229301000308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0261444815000075 · DOI
- 10.1177/026553220101800103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0272263109990039 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effects of captions on L2 learners’ comprehension of vlogs
Aldukhayel, D. (2021) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/73439 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Noreillie, A.-S., Kestemont, B., Heylen, K., Desmet, P., & Peters, E.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven
- ITEC (KU Leuven – imec)
- Venue
- ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2018-04-16
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 212-231
- ISSN
- 0019-0829
- 1783-1490
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension at an intermediate level in English and French as foreign languages: An approximate replication study of Stæhr (2009). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/itl.00013.nor
- The paper
- Noreillie, A.-S., Kestemont, B., Heylen, K., Desmet, P., & Peters, E. (2018). Vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension at an intermediate level in English and French as foreign languages: An approximate replication study of Stæhr (2009). ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.00013.nor