The DOI matches its Crossref record.
9. Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE
Ellis, N. C. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226310505014x · Cited by 893
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000365 · Cited by 741
Recasts in the Adult English L2 Classroom: Characteristics, Explicitness, and Effectiveness
LOEWEN, S., & PHILP, J. (2006) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x · Cited by 408
Self-citationAttention and Memory during SLA
Robinson, P. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch19 · Cited by 402
Form‐Focused Instruction: Isolated or Integrated?
SPADA, N., & LIGHTBOWN, P. M. (2008) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00115.x · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T.
- Venue
- Language Learning & Language Teaching
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2002-09-27
- Pages
- 181-209
- ISSN
- 1569-9471 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2486766417
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 9. Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/lllt.2.12mac
- The paper
- Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). 9. Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. Language Learning & Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.12mac
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
