The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Different discursive micro-analytic traditions have different conventions for transcription systems, with the conversation analytic transcription system developed by Jefferson (2004) being the most detailed, noting overlaps in speech (i.e., interruptions), pauses (or their lack), emphasis and stretched sounds (e.g.,”
From Studying Identity Development in Everyday Conversations: A Practical Guide to Developmental Discursive Micro-Analysis (DDMA) (2026) · cites this paper as Jefferson, 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction
Mondada, L. (2014) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 · Cited by 536
Irvine, A., Drew, P., & Sainsbury, R. (2013) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794112439086 · Cited by 497
Alač, M., Movellan, J., & Tanaka, F. (2011) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312711420565 · Cited by 109
Social robots: Things or agents?
Alač, M. (2016) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-015-0631-6 · Cited by 96
Large, D. R., Clark, L., Quandt, A., Burnett, G., & Skrypchuk, L. (2017) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.04.003 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Jefferson, G.
- Venue
- Pragmatics & Beyond New Series
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2004-08-31
- Pages
- 13-31
- ISSN
- 0922-842X
- Cited by
- 2,885
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
