The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cassell, J., Pelachaud, C., Badler, N., Steedman, M., Achorn, B., Becket, T., Douville, B., Prevost, S., & Stone, M. (1994) · Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '94 · doi:10.1145/192161.192272 · Cited by 665
The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure
(2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.001.0001 · Cited by 423
Topicalization and left-dislocation: a functional opposition revisited
Gregory, M. L., & Michaelis, L. A. (2001) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00063-1 · Cited by 347
Specificity and Differential Object Marking in Spanish
Leonetti, M. (2004) · Catalan Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.5565/rev/catjl.106 · Cited by 330
A Corpus-Based Investigation of Definite Description Use
Poesio, M., & Vieira, R. L. R. (1997) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cmp-lg/9710007 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Prince, E. F.
- Venue
- Pragmatics & Beyond New Series
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 1992
- Pages
- 295
- ISSN
- 0922-842X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W117665274
- Cited by
- 820
- References
- 0
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/pbns.16.12pri
- The paper
- Prince, E. F. (1992). The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16.12pri
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
