The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pragmatics and Classical Sanskrit: A pilot study in linguistic politeness
Abstract
This book explores the possibilities and limitations of pragmatic research in classical Sanskrit concentrating on linguistic politeness. The four case studies it comprises are in essence empirical, and try to accurately describe a fairly limited number of interactions between an also limited number of people. The underlying assumption is that a micro-analysis yields recognizable patterns of communicative styles and that these generalizations improve our insight in the workings of politeness (deference) in this language and in languages in general. This book also shows that the relation between classical languages and pragmatics is not necessarily a one-way street. The data provide ample evidence that a detailed text study offers rich opportunities both to supplement experimental studies (e.g. the Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Project) and to evaluate existing pragmatic theories constructed on the basis of contemporary languages.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Van de Walle ' s (1993: 104 -10) examination of the use of these modal forms affirms that, in Classical Sanskrit, they are somewhat more nuanced and context-specific than in the grammarians ' discussion, for the latter are frequently based on P ā n ̣ ini.”
From Studies in dhāraṇī literature II: Pragmatics of dhāraṇī s (2014) · cites this paper as Van de Walle ' s (1993: 104 -10)
In the citing paper
“Politeness in classical Sanskrit literature sometimes implicates the use of interjections; see van der Walle 1993, esp. pp. 126 -7.”
From Studies in dhāraṇī literature II: Pragmatics of dhāraṇī s (2014) · cites this paper as van der Walle 1993
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Studies in dhāraṇī literature II: Pragmatics of dhāraṇī s
Davidson, R. M. (2014) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x13000943 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Van de Walle, L.
- Venue
- Pragmatics & Beyond New Series
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 1993-11-19
- ISSN
- 0922-842X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966481219
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pragmatics & beyond. New series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Keywords
- classical Sanskrit, politeness, deference, pragmatic theory, speech act theory, communication styles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review