Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 32 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“I’m sorry I don’t agree with you”: Can we teach nonnative students pragmatic competence when expressing disagreement?

Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen·2014·Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics

Abstract

Disagreement has been relatively less studied than other speech acts such as requests or compliments, especially as produced by nonnative speakers of English. The present study aims to analyze the production of disagreement by an international group of Master students who use English as lingua franca in an online collaborative project. More specifically, the study tries to answer the following research questions: (1) does linguistic proficiency entail pragmatic competence? and (2), what is the effect of explicit instruction on pragmatic competence? To this purpose, two subcorpora (prior to and post instruction) were gathered by means of two online collaborative activities, rendering a total of 25,347 words. The analysis of the data reveals that high linguistic proficiency plays a crucial role in pragmatic competence. On the other hand, explicit instruction seems to benefit students to different extents, with intermediate B1 students improving their expression of disagreement and lower level students still remaining far from pragmatic and linguistic competence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/resla.27.2.09mai

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Al Khatib, 2006, The pragmatics of invitation making and acceptance in Jordanian society, Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5, 272
  2. Bardovi-Harlig, 2004, The organization of turns in the disagreements of L2 learners: A longitudinal perspective, 199
  3. Bond, 2000, Culture as an explanatory variable: Problems and possibilities, 293
  4. Díaz Pérez, 2003, La cortesía verbal en inglés y en español: Actos de habla y pragmática intercultural
  5. Grimshaw, 1990, Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations in conversations
  6. Kakavá, 1993, Negotiation of disagreement by Greeks in conversations and classroom discourse
  7. Lawson, 2009, From the classroom to the bar-room: Expressions of disagreement by Japanese speakers of English
  8. Liang, 2005, A contrastive study on disagreement strategies for politeness between American English & Mandarin Chinese, Asian EFL Journal, 7, 1
  9. Santamaría-García, 2006, La negociación de acuerdo en la conversación coloquial: Estudio contrastivo español-inglés
  10. Tannen, 1994, The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance, 19

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Maíz-Arévalo, C.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
Venue
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2014-12-08
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
433-453
ISSN
  • 0213-2028 (ISSN-L)
  • 2254-6774
OpenAlex
W2041829750
Cited by
3
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
disagreement, speech acts, pragmatic competence, language proficiency, English as a lingua franca, explicit instruction, non-native English speakers, online collaborative writing, international students, B1 level

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “I’m sorry I don’t agree with you”: Can we teach nonnative students pragmatic competence when expressing disagreement? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/resla.27.2.09mai
The paper
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2014). “I’m sorry I don’t agree with you”: Can we teach nonnative students pragmatic competence when expressing disagreement? Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.2.09mai

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.