Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Is Basque morphologically ergative? Western Basque vs. Eastern Basque

Aldai, Gontzal·2009·Studies in Language

Abstract

Although Basque’s case-marking pattern has conventionally been regarded as ergative, I argue in this article that it is not straightforward to determine whether this pattern is actually ergative or rather semantically-based. Several factors make this one a complex issue. Perhaps the most important factor among these, and one which has gone largely unnoticed in the literature, is the fact that there are clear dialectal differences regarding the behavior of lexically-simple unergative verbs. Another complication comes from establishing the specific contrast underlying the putative semantic split among Basque intransitives. With these questions in mind, I propose that the case-marking system of Western Basque should be considered semantically aligned instead of ergative. This system is based on a contrast patientive / non-patientive. Conversely, Eastern and Central Basque may be considered to have an ergative case-marking system, but one which differs in some respects from that of the most typical ergative languages and which is not too different from a semantic system.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/sl.33.4.01ald

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Aldai, G.
Affiliations
University of the Basque Country
Venue
Studies in Language
Published
2009-10-22
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
783-831
ISSN
  • 0378-4177
  • 1569-9978
Cited by
17
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Basque morphologically ergative? Western Basque vs. Eastern Basque. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/sl.33.4.01ald
The paper
Aldai, G. (2009). Is Basque morphologically ergative? Western Basque vs. Eastern Basque. Studies in Language. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.4.01ald