The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Writing and Identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing
Abstract
Writing is not just about conveying ‘content’ but also about the representation of self. (One of the reasons people find writing difficult is that they do not feel comfortable with the ‘me’ they are portraying in their writing. Academic writing in particular often poses a conflict of identity for students in higher education, because the ‘self’ which is inscribed in academic discourse feels alien to them.) The main claim of this book is that writing is an act of identity in which people align themselves with socio-culturally shaped subject positions, and thereby play their part in reproducing or challenging dominant practices and discourses, and the values, beliefs and interests which they embody. The first part of the book reviews recent understandings of social identity, of the discoursal construction of identity, of literacy and identity, and of issues of identity in research on academic writing. The main part of the book is based on a collaborative research project about writing and identity with mature-age students, providing: • a case study of one writer’s dilemmas over the presentation of self; • a discussion of the way in which writers’ life histories shape their presentation of self in writing; • an interview-based study of issues of ownership, and of accommodation and resistance to conventions for the presentation of self; • linguistic analysis of the ways in which multiple, often contradictory, interests, values, beliefs and practices are inscribed in discourse conventions, which set up a range of possibilities for self-hood for writers. The book ends with implications of the study for research on writing and identity, and for the learning and teaching of academic writing. The book will be of interest to students and researchers in the fields of social identity, literacy, discourse analysis, rhetoric and composition studies, and to all those concerned to understand what is involved in academic writing in order to provide wider access to higher education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Discourse: A Critical Introduction
Blommaert, J. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610295 · Cited by 2,369
The "Academic Literacies" Model: Theory and Applications
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11 · Cited by 1,223
Identity, language learning, and social change
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444811000309 · Cited by 1,168
The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070120099368 · Cited by 795
Literacy and Identity: Examining the Metaphors in History and Contemporary Research
Moje, E. B., & Luke, A. (2009) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.44.4.7 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Ivanič, R.
- Venue
- Studies in Written Language and Literacy
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 1998-03-15
- ISSN
- 0929-7324 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210715035
- Cited by
- 1,043
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.98
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Writing and Identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/swll.5
- The paper
- Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and Identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Studies in Written Language and Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.