Cited by 1,223Linguistics and Education ResearchDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesLiteracy, Media, and Education

The "Academic Literacies" Model: Theory and Applications

Lea, Mary R., Street, Brian V.·2006·Theory Into Practice

Abstract

Although the term academic literacies was originally developed with regard to the study of literacies in higher education and the university, the concept also applies to K–12 education. An academic literacies perspective treats reading and writing as social practices that vary with context, culture, and genre (Barton & Hamilton, 1998; Street, 1984, 1995). The literacy practices of academic disciplines can be viewed as varied social practices associated with different communities. In addition, an academic literacies perspective also takes account of literacies not directly associated with subjects and disciplines, but with broader institutional discourses and genres. From the student point of view, a dominant feature of academic literacy practices is the requirement to switch their writing styles and genres between one setting and another, to deploy a repertoire of literacy practices appropriate to each setting, and to handle the social meanings and identities that each evokes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Information literacy and the various iterations of Standards that guide teaching it are in essence forms of academic socialization that seek to direct students toward specific skills, competencies, and abilities, even including critical thinking.

    “Judged in the light of its historical roots, information literacy, and the various iterations of Standards that guide us in teaching it, are in essence forms of academic socialization that seek to direct students toward specific skills, competencies, and abilities, even including critical thinking (Lea & Street, 2006).”

    From Student Success and the Neoliberal Academic Library (2016) · cites this paper as Lea & Street, 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V.
Venue
Theory Into Practice
Published
2006-11
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
368-377
ISSN
  • 0040-5841 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-0421
OpenAlex
W1975672703
Cited by
1,223
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 101 · 2012: 40
FWCI
214.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Theory Into Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
academic literacy, literacy practices, reading and writing as social practices, genre, institutional discourse, academic disciplines, K-12 education, higher education, writing style, student identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review