The "Academic Literacies" Model: Theory and Applications
Abstract
Although the term academic literacies was originally developed with regard to the study of literacies in higher education and the university, the concept also applies to K–12 education. An academic literacies perspective treats reading and writing as social practices that vary with context, culture, and genre (Barton & Hamilton, 1998; Street, 1984, 1995). The literacy practices of academic disciplines can be viewed as varied social practices associated with different communities. In addition, an academic literacies perspective also takes account of literacies not directly associated with subjects and disciplines, but with broader institutional discourses and genres. From the student point of view, a dominant feature of academic literacy practices is the requirement to switch their writing styles and genres between one setting and another, to deploy a repertoire of literacy practices appropriate to each setting, and to handle the social meanings and identities that each evokes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Information literacy and the various iterations of Standards that guide teaching it are in essence forms of academic socialization that seek to direct students toward specific skills, competencies, and abilities, even including critical thinking.
“Judged in the light of its historical roots, information literacy, and the various iterations of Standards that guide us in teaching it, are in essence forms of academic socialization that seek to direct students toward specific skills, competencies, and abilities, even including critical thinking (Lea & Street, 2006).”
From Student Success and the Neoliberal Academic Library (2016) · cites this paper as Lea & Street, 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197 · Cited by 1,108 · see citing works
Student Success and the Neoliberal Academic Library
Beilin, I. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v1.24303 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Feedback as a space for academic social practice in doctoral writing groups
Chakraborty, D., Soyoof, A., Moharami, M., Utami, A. D., Zeng, S., Cong-Lem, N., Hradsky, D., Maestre, J.-L., Foomani, E. M., & Pretorius, L. (2021) · Educational and Developmental Psychologist · doi:10.1080/20590776.2021.1972764 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Shen, Y., & Chen, L. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2479141 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Dialogism in feedback literacies: a critical review
Myers, T., & Buchanan, J. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2478159 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Newly arrived students’ writer agency at the end of preparatory education: writer profiles
Repo, E., Tarnanen, M., & Aalto, E. (2025) · International Journal of Multilingualism · doi:10.1080/14790718.2025.2591319
- Authors
- Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V.
- Venue
- Theory Into Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 368-377
- ISSN
- 0040-5841 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-0421
- OpenAlex
- W1975672703
- Cited by
- 1,223
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 101 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 214.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Theory Into Practice (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Keywords
- academic literacy, literacy practices, reading and writing as social practices, genre, institutional discourse, academic disciplines, K-12 education, higher education, writing style, student identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review