The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production
Abstract
The ideas of frequency and predictability have played a fundamental role in models of human language processing for well over a hundred years (Schuchardt, 1885; Jespersen, 1922; Zipf, 1929; Martinet, 1960; Oldfield & Wingfield, 1965; Fidelholz, 1975; Jescheniak & Levelt, 1994; Bybee, 1996). While most psycholinguistic models have thus long included word frequency as a component, recent models have proposed more generally that probabilistic information about words, phrases, and other linguistic structure is represented in the minds of language users and plays a role in language comprehension (Jurafsky, 1996; MacDonald, 1993; McRae, Spivey-Knowlton, & Tanenhaus, 1998; Narayanan & Jurafsky, 1998; Trueswell & Tanenhaus, 1994) production (Gregory, Raymond, Bell, Fosler-Lussier, & Jurafsky, 1999; Roland & Jurafsky, 2000) and learning (Brent & Cartwright, 1996; Landauer & Dumais, 1997; Saffran, Aslin, & Newport, 1996; Seidenberg & MacDonald, 1999). In recent papers (Bell, Jurafsky, Fosler-Lussier, Girand, & Gildea, 1999; Gregory et al., 1999; Jurafsky, Bell, Fosler-Lussier, Girand, & Raymond, 1998), we have been studying the role of predictability and frequency in lexical production. Our goal is to understand the many factors that affect production variability as reflected in reduction processes such as vowel reduction, durational shortening, or final segmental deletion of words in spontaneous speech. One proposal that has resulted from this work is the Probabilistic Reduction Hypothesis: word forms are reduced when they have a higher probability. The probability of a word is conditioned on many aspects of its context, including neighboring words, syntactic and lexical structure, semantic expectations, and discourse factors. This proposal thus generalizes over earlier models which refer only to word frequency (Zipf, 1929; Fidelholz, 1975; Rhodes, 1992, 1996) or predictability (Fowler & Housum, 1987). In this paper we focus on a particular domain of probabilistic linguistic knowledge in lexical production: the role of local probabilistic relations between words.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SWITCHBOARD: telephone speech corpus for research and development
Godfrey, J. J., Holliman, E. C., & McDaniel, J. (1992) · [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.1992.225858 · Cited by 2,134
Cited by
Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change
Bybee, J. (2002) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394502143018 · Cited by 892
More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005 · Cited by 791
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1500031x · Cited by 733
ELLIS, N. C., SIMPSON‐VLACH, R., & MAYNARD, C. (2008) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00137.x · Cited by 655
The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.001.0001 · Cited by 639
Metadata
- Authors
- Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W. D.
- Venue
- Typological Studies in Language
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2001-10-15
- Pages
- 229-254
- ISSN
- 0167-7373 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1486114846
- Cited by
- 762
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.89
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/tsl.45.13jur
- The paper
- Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W. D. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. Typological Studies in Language. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.13jur
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.