Can L2 learners productively use Japanese tense-aspect markers? A usage-based approach
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a case study of a native Russian speaker learning Japanese over 10 months, verbs that are more consistently conjugated in a certain common form compared to other possible forms were produced exclusively in the common form early in the learning trajectory, whereas this preferential bias was not observed for verbs that do not have a common form.
“They found that verbs that are more consistently conjugated in a certain common form compared to other possible forms, such as siru”
From Effects of Availability, Contingency, and Formulaicity on the Accuracy of English Grammatical Morphemes in Second Language Writing (2022) · cites this paper as Sugaya and Shirai (2009)
There is parallel L2 research showing the importance of contingency in production.
“There is parallel L2 research showing the importance of contingency in production.”
From Effects of Availability, Contingency, and Formulaicity on the Accuracy of English Grammatical Morphemes in Second Language Writing (2022) · cites this paper as Sugaya and Shirai (2009)
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Formulaic Language and Second Language Acquisition: Zipf and the Phrasal Teddy Bear
Ellis, N. (2012) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190512000025 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Murakami, A., & Ellis, N. C. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12500 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Guo, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.582259 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Verb learning and the acquisition of aspect
Nishi, Y., & Shirai, Y. (2019) · Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/lab.18084.nis · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationIntroduction: Convergence and divergence in functional and formal approaches to SLA
Shirai, Y., & Juffs, A. (2017) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658316681046 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationHow bilinguals refer to Mandarin throwing actions in English
Nicoladis, E., & Gao, H. H. (2021) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/13670069211022853 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Chengping, X. (2016) · Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cjal-2016-0017 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Chapter 8. The L2 acquisition of the present in the Japanese tense-aspect system
Li, N. H., & Shirai, Y. (2015) · John Benjamins Publishing Company eBooks · doi:10.1075/z.196.08li · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationYanchak, T. (2010) · Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)
Usage-based approach to teaching L2 pragmatics
Li, Q., & Taguchi, N. (2023) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.58.11liq
- Authors
- Sugaya, N., & Shirai, Y.
- ORCID
- Shirai, Yasuhiro
- Venue
- Typological Studies in Language
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2009-05-20
- Pages
- 423-444
- ISSN
- 0167-7373 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2499705228
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Typological studies in language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Keywords
- second language acquisition, usage-based learning, Japanese as a second language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
