Cited by 18EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEnglish Language Learning and TeachingSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Language Learners Learning Independently: How Autonomous are they?

Reinders, Hayo, Cotterall, Sara·2001·Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen

Abstract

Independent language learning is an essential complement to classroom-based learning, both for reasons of efficiency in learning and as a means to develop learner autonomy. In an effort to encourage out-of-class learning, many institutions in the last ten years have established language resource centres where learners are encouraged to learn independently. This article reports on an investigation of the perceptions and practices of a group of learners enrolled in an intensive English course in relation to their out-of-class language learning. The investigation included an evaluation of the self-access resources in terms of their efficiency and effectiveness as welll as an investigation of learners' understanding of the concepts involved in independent learning. It was found that learners hold positive attitudes towards independent learning, and a number of factors contributing to these perceptions were identified. However, it was also found that these attitudes were based on a rather shallow awareness of what independent learning entails.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/ttwia.65.09rei

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research (Reinders and Cotterall 2001) showed that open questions about resources led to very general comments mainly about the quantity of materials and the types of materials students preferred, unless the questions were specific to one or more materials present in the Centre.

    “Previous research had shown (Reinders and Cotterall 2001) that open questions about resources led to very general comments mainly about the quantity of the materials and the types of materials students preferred, unless the questions were specific to one or more materials present in the Centre.”

    From An evaluative checklist for self-access materials (2006) · cites this paper as Reinders and Cotterall 2001

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Reinders, H., & Cotterall, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Venue
Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen
Published
2001-01-01
Volume
65
Pages
85-96
ISSN
  • 0169-7420 (ISSN-L)
  • 2213-4883
OpenAlex
W2017250767
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
nl
Open access
closed
Locations
Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
independent language learning, self-access learning, learner autonomy, out-of-class learning, learner perceptions, intensive English course, student attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review