Cited by 44Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Bidirectional cross-linguistic relations of first and second language skills in reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English learners

Gottardo, Alexandra, Javier, Christine, Farnia, Fataneh, Mak, Lorinda, Geva, Esther·2014·Written Language & Literacy

Abstract

This study examines the bidirectional, cross-linguistic associations between language and word-level reading skills and reading comprehension for 51 students in grades 4 to 6 who speak Spanish as first language (L1) and English as second language (L2). Within-language predictors of reading comprehension were consistent with the simple view of reading. We found unidirectional cross-linguistic associations between Spanish word reading and English reading comprehension. However, the results do not support a cross-linguistic association between English word reading and Spanish reading comprehension. Specifically, results indicate that although L1 and L2 language and reading constructs correlate, L2 skills do not strongly contribute to L1 reading comprehension. Findings are discussed in terms of possible factors that might influence potential cross-language relations among Spanish and English measures. Keywords: reading comprehension; bilingualism; cross-linguistic relations

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/wll.17.1.04got

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gottardo et al. (2014) showed that L1 word reading predicted L2 reading comprehension.

    “and a study by Gottardo et al. (2014) on Spanish-English bilingual children showed that L1 word reading predicted L2 reading comprehension.”

    From Do word-level skills show cross-linguistic transfer and predict bilingual reading? (2026) · cites this paper as Gottardo et al., 2014

  • The association between L1 and L2 vocabulary is likely to be shown in the two languages that have a substantial number of cognates.

    “The association between L1 and L2 vocabulary is also likely to be shown in the two languages that have a substantial number of cognates as several studies indicated (Gottardo et al., 2014, 2021).”

    From Do word-level skills show cross-linguistic transfer and predict bilingual reading? (2026) · cites this paper as Gottardo et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gottardo, A., Javier, C., Farnia, F., Mak, L., & Geva, E.
Affiliations
  • Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Written Language & Literacy
Published
2014-04-11
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
62-88
ISSN
  • 1387-6732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1570-6001
OpenAlex
W2069480297
Cited by
44
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Written Language & Literacy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
reading comprehension, bilingualism, Spanish as a first language, English as a second language, word reading, Simple View of Reading, early elementary students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review