Cited by 234Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Reading, syntactic, and working memory skills of bilingual Portuguese-English Canadian children

Da Fontoura, Helena A., Siegel, Linda S.·1995·Reading and Writing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01026951

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Da Fontoura, H. A., & Siegel, L. S.
Venue
Reading and Writing
Published
1995-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
139-153
ISSN
  • 0922-4777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0905
OpenAlex
W1981243492
Cited by
234
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reading and Writing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
bilingualism, heritage language, reading disorders, working memory, syntactic awareness, pseudoword reading, phonological processing, grapheme-to-phoneme conversion, language transfer, reading acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review