Cited by 23Teaching and Learning ProgrammingScience Education and PedagogyDesign Education and Practice

Insights and Conflicts in Discussing Recursion: A Case Study

Levy, Dalit·2001·Computer Science Education

Abstract

Recursion is a significant concept, appearing in almost every introductory course in Computer Science (CS). CS educators and educational researchers often refer to difficulties in learning and teaching recursion. However, the research literature barely addresses the unique ways in which students relate to this interdisciplinary concept and the particular learners’ language concerning recursive phenomena. The gap is most apparent when seen through a constructivist lens, where the students’ prior knowledge and idiosyncratic conceptions should be referred to and reflected upon in order to serve as a basis for further knowledge construction. This paper reports on a study in which a collaborative classification of several recursive phenomena are used to facilitate the construction of recursion. The student discourse was recorded and analyzed, and a grounded categorical system was formed and examined. Preliminary results indicate some basic aspects of recursion in the student discourse, although the students apparently talk a very different language from that of the experts. Some ‘potentially rich’ discourse episodes were evident as well, representing conflicts among alternative conceptions. Such episodes can serve as a springboard for further learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1076/csed.11.4.305.3829

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levy, D.
Corresponding author
Levy, Dalit
Venue
Computer Science Education
Published
2001-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
305-322
ISSN
  • 0899-3408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5175
OpenAlex
W2164113162
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Science Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
Keywords
recursion, student conceptions, student discourse, misconceptions, collaborative classification, constructivism, prior knowledge, conceptual disputes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review