The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web-based Cases in Teaching and Learning – the Quality of Discussions and a Stage of Perspective Taking in Asynchronous Communication
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the quality of asynchronous interaction in web-based conferencing among pre-service teachers. Because all successful communication presumes perspective-taking skills and reciprocal understanding among the participants, we study whether the students are able to reach in reciprocal interaction and thus create educationally relevant high-level web-based discussion. The research project has its foundation in socio-constructivist learning theories, one of the most important principles of which is the idea of apprenticeship in thinking. To create a learning project in web-based conferencing we developed pedagogical practices, which enhance higher-level networked communication and make use of theoretical and expert knowledge. The study combines the power of asynchronous conferencing with peer and mentor collaboration to electronically apprentice student learning. The subjects of the study are pre-service teachers in the United States (N ?=?40) and Finland (N ?=?30) who use an asynchronous web-based tool called Conferencing on the Web (COW) to collaborate in creating joint case-based descriptions in different areas of teaching and learning. The results point out different levels of web-based discussion. Three kinds were found: higher-level discussion, progressive discussion and lower-level discussion. More specific analysis of the quality of each discussion level focused on perspective taking in communication. The results support our hypothesis that higher-level perspective taking was related to higher-level discussion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123 · Cited by 2,630
The Emergence of Abstract Representations in Dyad Problem Solving
Schwartz, D. L. (1995) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0403_3 · Cited by 410
Howell-Richardson, C., & Mellar, H. (1996) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00156003 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review
De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005 · Cited by 940
A purposive approach to content analysis: Designing analytical frameworks
Gerbic, P., & Stacey, E. (2005) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.003 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P.
- Venue
- Interactive Learning Environments
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-5191
- OpenAlex
- W2126684352
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 62.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web-based Cases in Teaching and Learning – the Quality of Discussions and a Stage of Perspective Taking in Asynchronous Communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1076/ilee.10.1.1.3613
- The paper
- Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2002). Web-based Cases in Teaching and Learning – the Quality of Discussions and a Stage of Perspective Taking in Asynchronous Communication. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1076/ilee.10.1.1.3613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.