The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuropsychological Assessment of Response Inhibition in Adults With ADHD
Abstract
Several theoretical models suggest that the core deficit of ADHD is a deficiency in response inhibition. While neuropsychological deficits in response inhibition are well documented in ADHD children, research on these deficits in adult ADHD populations is minimal. Twenty-five adult ADHD patients, 15 anxiety-disordered adult patients, and 30 normal adults completed three neuropsychological tests of response inhibition: the Continuous Performance Test, Posner Visual Orienting Test, and the Stop Signal Task. ADHD adults demonstrated response inhibition performance deficits when compared to both normal adults and anxiety disordered adults only on the Continuous Performance Test. A similar pattern of differences was not observed on the other two neuropsychological tests. Differing results between tasks may be due to differences in test reliability, task parameters, or the targeted area of brain functioning assessed by each test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.3.295 · Cited by 2,590
Barkley, R. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.121.1.65 · Cited by 580
Losier, B. J., McGrath, P. J., & Klein, R. M. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01494.x · Cited by 424
Corkum, P. V., & Siegel, L. S. (1993) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01784.x · Cited by 378
Cited by
Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS vital signs
GUALTIERI, C., & JOHNSON, L. (2006) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.007 · Cited by 873
Neuropsychology of Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Review.
Hervey, A. S., Epstein, J. N., & Curry, J. F. (2004) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.485 · Cited by 781
Self-citationReaction time variability in ADHD: A meta-analytic review of 319 studies
Kofler, M. J., Rapport, M. D., Sarver, D. E., Raiker, J. S., Orban, S. A., Friedman, L. M., & Kolomeyer, E. G. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.06.001 · Cited by 648
Inhibitory control and psychopathology: A meta-analysis of studies using the stop signal task
LIPSZYC, J., & SCHACHAR, R. (2010) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617710000895 · Cited by 627
Lijffijt, M., Kenemans, J. L., Verbaten, M. N., & van Engeland, H. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.2.216 · Cited by 592
Metadata
- Authors
- Epstein, J. N., Johnson, D. E., Varia, I. M., & Conners, C. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 362-371
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 1380-3395
- 1744-411X
- OpenAlex
- W2080982708
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropsychological Assessment of Response Inhibition in Adults With ADHD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1076/jcen.23.3.362.1186
- The paper
- Epstein, J. N., Johnson, D. E., Varia, I. M., & Conners, C. K. (2001). Neuropsychological Assessment of Response Inhibition in Adults With ADHD. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.23.3.362.1186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
