The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Dose-Response Relation of Headers and Concussions With Cognitive Impairment in Professional Soccer Players
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of headers and concussions on cognitive impairment in professional soccer players. A group of 84 active professional soccer players from several premier league soccer clubs underwent neuropsychological evaluations. The dose-response relation between the number of headers in one professional season and the number of soccer-related concussions on cognitive functioning was investigated. It was found that the number of headers in one season was related to poorer results on tests measuring focused attention and visual/verbal memory. Soccer-related concussions were related to poorer results on tests measuring sustained attention and visuoperceptual processing. The findings suggest that headers as well as concussions separately contribute to cognitive impairment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which has been related to poorer results in cognitive tests in football players (Matser et al., 2001).”
From Severely increased risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis among Italian professional football players (2005) · cites this paper as Matser et al., 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carroll, L., Cassidy, J. D., Peloso, P., Borg, J., von Holst, H., Holm, L., Paniak, C., & Pépin, M. (2004) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1080/16501960410023859 · Cited by 1,326
Severely increased risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis among Italian professional football players
Chio, A. (2005) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh373 · Cited by 484
Validity of ImPACT for measuring processing speed following sports-related concussion
Iverson, G. L., Lovell, M. R., & Collins, M. W. (2005) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1081/13803390490918435 · Cited by 278
Concussion in chronic traumatic encephalopathy
Stein, T. D., Alvarez, V. E., & McKee, A. C. (2015) · Current Pain and Headache Reports · doi:10.1007/s11916-015-0522-z · Cited by 177
Gender differences in sleep symptoms after repeat concussions
Oyegbile, T. O., Delasobera, B. E., & Zecavati, N. (2017) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2017.09.026 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Matser, J. T., Kessels, A. G. H., Lezak, M. D., & Troost, J.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 770-774
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 1380-3395
- 1744-411X
- OpenAlex
- W2028470508
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- headers, cognitive impairment, professional football players, dose-response relationship, sustained attention, visual memory, verbal memory, neuropsychological assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Brain Concussion, Cross-Sectional Studies, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Male, Memory, Netherlands, Neuropsychological Tests, Sampling Studies, Soccer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review