Cited by 844Plant Stress Responses and ToleranceGenetics and Plant BreedingTurfgrass Adaptation and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 187 of the 193 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants

Ashraf, Muhammad·2004·Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1078/0367-2530-00165

Cites

187 of 187 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Burman, 2003, Water relations, photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea Czern & Coss.) grown under salt and water stress, J. Plant Biol., 30, 55
  2. Chandra Babu, 1985, Relationship between leaf photosynthesis and yield in blackgram (Vigna mungo L, Hepper) genotypes. –Photosynthetica, 19, 159
  3. Elzam, 1969, Salt relation of two grass species differing in salt tolerance I. Growth and salt content at different salt concentrations. II. Kinetics of the absorption of K+, Na+ and Cl− by their excised roots, Agrochimica, 13, 190
  4. Freitas, 2001, Expression of physiological traits related to salt tolerance in two contrasting cowpea cultivars, Documentos Embrapa Meio-Norte, 56, 115
  5. Haq, 2002, Effect of soil salinity on the concentration of Na+, K+ and Cl− in the leaf sap of the four Brassica species, Int. J. Agric. Biol., 4, 385
  6. Lakshmi, 1996, Effect of NaCl on photosynthesis parameters in two cultivars of mulberry, Photosynthetica, 32, 285
  7. Mahmood, A. (1991): Genetic, physiological and biochemical studies of salt tolerance in wheat and its related species. –Ph.D thesis, Cambridge University.
  8. Malibari, 1993, Effect of salinity on germination and growth of alfalfa, sunflower and sorghum, Pak. J. Bot., 25, 156
  9. Niu, 1993, Halophytes up-regulate plasma membrane H+-ATPase gene more rapidly than glycophytes in response to salt stress, Plant Physiol., 102, 130
  10. Soussi, 2001, Growth, nitrogen fixation and ion accumulation in two chickpea cultivars under salt stress, Agricoltura Mediterranea, 131, 1
  11. Unno, 2002, Relationship between salt tolerance and Ca2+ retention among plant species, Japan. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 73, 715
  12. Xingyu, 2001, Comparison of regulation of NaCl for photosynthetic and osmotic adjustment ability of maize and cotton, Plant Physiol. Commun., 37, 303

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 844

Metadata

Authors
Ashraf, M.
Affiliations
University of Agriculture Faisalabad (PK)
Corresponding author
Ashraf, Muhammad
Venue
Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
199
Issue
5
Pages
361-376
ISSN
0367-2530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161450708
Cited by
842
References
193
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 43
FWCI
14.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Flora (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
Keywords
salt tolerance, plant breeding, selection criteria, osmotic adjustment, photosynthesis, water relations, physiological parameters, crop improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review