Cited by 619Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of biodiversity for element cycling and trophic interactions: an experimental approach in a grassland community

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1078/1439-1791-00216

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Diemer, 1997, An experimental protocol to assess the effects of plant diversity on ecosystem functioning utilized in an European research network, Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH, 63, 95
  2. Ellenberg, 1967, A key to Raunkiaer plant life forms with revised subdivisions. Berichte des Geobotanischen Instituts der ETH, Stift, Rübel, Zürich, 37, 56
  3. Ellenberg, 1992, 18, 258
  4. Hundt, 1958, Beiträge zur Wiesenvegetation Mitteleuropas. I. Die Auenwiesen an der Elbe, Saale und Mulde, Nova Acta Leopoldina N.F., 135
  5. Hundt, 1961, Die Auswirkungen der Saaletalsperren auf die Grünlandvegetation des mittleren Saaletales, Mitteilungen des Instituts für Wasserwirtschaft, 14, 21
  6. Körner, 2000, Biosphere responses to CO2 enrichment, Ecological Applications, 10, 1590
  7. Schwarze S-K (1993) Biotopkartierung im Stadtgebiet von Jena. Die „Obere Saaleaue” zwischen Camsdorfer Brücke und Göschwitz. Diploma thesis, University of Jena
  8. Uthleb S (1995) Biotopkartierung im Stadtgebiet Jena. Die “Untere Saaleaue” zwischen Camsdorfer Brücke und Zwätzen. Diploma thesis, University of Jena

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 607

Metadata

Authors
Roscher, C., Schumacher, J., Baade, J., Wilcke, W., Gleixner, G., Weisser, W. W., Schmid, B., & Schulze, E.-D.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Roscher, Christiane
Venue
Basic and Applied Ecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
107-121
ISSN
1439-1791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018328348
Cited by
619
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 23
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Basic and Applied Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Keywords
biodiversity, element cycling, trophic interactions, plant diversity, herbivores, soil fauna, plant functional groups, dominance effects, species mixtures, nutrient cycling, grassland biodiversity experiment, plant-soil feedback, plant-herbivore interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review