Cited by 19Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

Transgressive overyielding of soil microbial biomass in a grassland plant diversity gradient

Guenay, Yasemin, Ebeling, Anne, Steinauer, Katja, Weisser, Wolfgang W., Eisenhauer, Nico·2013·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

In a grassland plant diversity experiment, we studied if plant species richness induces transgressive overyielding in soil microbial biomass, the definition of which is greater microbial biomass with a plant mixture than in each of the plant monocultures. In June and November of 2012 soil microbial biomass increased significantly with plant species richness. Overyielding occurred in more than 61% of 24 plots containing six species, and transgressive overyielding occurred in 13–21% of the plots depending on season. Plots with nine species showed overyielding in all cases, and 25–50% showed transgressive overyielding. Transgressive underyielding occurred in a few plots with six species in June. Our results indicate plant complementarity effects on soil microbial biomass in diverse plant communities across seasons and stress the relevance of simplification of plant communities for soil processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.015

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The positive plant diversity effect on soil carbon storage, root biomass and soil microbial biomass was also found for deeper soil layers in The Jena Experiment.

    “In contrast, the positive plant diversity effect on soil carbon storage (Table 1), root biomass 39 and soil microbial biomass 40 was also found for deeper soil layers in The Jena Experiment.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guenay, Y., Ebeling, A., Steinauer, K., Weisser, W. W., & Eisenhauer, N.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Corresponding author
Eisenhauer, Nico
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
60
Pages
122-124
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064112209
Cited by
19
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Keywords
transgressive overyielding, soil microbial biomass, plant species richness, plant diversity gradient, grassland, seasonal variation, soil processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review