The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantifying some responses to pain as a stressor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “A Life Worth Living”
Mellor, D. (2016) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani6030021 · Cited by 948
Self-citationMellor, D., & Beausoleil, N. (2015) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.24.3.241 · Cited by 627
Self-citationDehorning and disbudding distress and its alleviation in calves
Stafford, K. J., & Mellor, D. J. (2005) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.02.005 · Cited by 296
Self-citationEye temperature and heart rate variability of calves disbudded with or without local anaesthetic
Stewart, M., Stafford, K. J., Dowling, S. K., Schaefer, A. L., & Webster, J. R. (2008) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.11.044 · Cited by 294
Self-citationInvited review: The welfare of young calves transported by road
Roadknight, N., Mansell, P., Jongman, E., Courtman, N., & Fisher, A. (2021) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-19346 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Mellor, D. J., Cook, C. J., & Stafford, K. J.
- Venue
- The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare.
- Publisher
- CABI Publishing
- Published
- 2000-01
- Pages
- 171-198
- OpenAlex
- W2477622615
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying some responses to pain as a stressor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/9780851993591.0171
- The paper
- Mellor, D. J., Cook, C. J., & Stafford, K. J. (2000). Quantifying some responses to pain as a stressor. The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851993591.0171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
