The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validating a captive elephant welfare index
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CEWI measures were validated by behavioral and physiological (urinary cortisol) measures in Asian elephants managed at three zoos and three sanctuaries.
“These measures were validated by behavioral and physiological (urinary cortisol) measures in Asian elephants managed at three zoos and three sanctuaries.”
From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [71]
Elephants with low CEWI scores had higher urinary cortisol and exhibited more stereotypic behaviors.
“Elephants with low CEWI scores had higher urinary cortisol and exhibited more stereotypic behaviors.”
From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [71]
Captive Elephant Welfare Index is based on the concept that captive elephant welfare is related to multiple husbandry parameters.
“This tool is based on the concept that captive elephant welfare is related to multiple husbandry parameters (71).”
From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghimire, R., Brown, J. L., Thitaram, C., & Bansiddhi, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2024.1370909 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Gurusamy, V., & Phillips, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- ORCID
- Phillips, Clive
- Venue
- The elephant tourism business
- Publisher
- CABI
- Published
- 2020-12-17
- Pages
- 232-246
- OpenAlex
- W4285541275
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CABI eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- captive elephants, welfare analysis, index validation, zoo animals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
