The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The chromium-51 complex of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid as a soluble rumen marker
Open accessAbstract
In experiments on digestive function in ruminants, markers can be used to estimate the rate of movement of digesta, the volume of a viscus and the rates of absorption of solutes from the gut.The most widely used water-soluble marker is polyethylene glycol (PEG), which was introduced by Sperber, HydCn & Ekman (1953).They found that the polymer with mean molecular weight 4000 was not degraded in the gut or absorbed, and described the use of PEG for the three purposes set out above.HydCn (1961) has given a full mathematical treatment of the principles involved in the use of soluble markers to measure the rate of flow and volume of rumen fluid, and has indicated the inherent limitations of the method.He found that PEG gave a satisfactory estimate of rumen fluid volume (PEG space was approximately 95 % of rumen water volume); in experiments of long duration (i.e.days or weeks), the flow rate could be calculated from the rate of fall in concentration of the marker; and in short-term experiments, the flow could be estimated from the amount of reference substance that had disappeared from the rumen during the experiment and the mean concentration of the marker in the rumen fluid.However, a serious limitation in the use of PEG is the lack of a specific, sensitive and accurate method of analysis.All published methods have been based on precipitation from aqueous solution with subsequent gravimetric or turbidimetric measurement.Analytical difficulties have been recorded by Smith (1958), and Corbett, Greenhalgh, Gwym & Walker (19 j8) obtained incomplete recovery of PEG from the faeces of grazing cattle and sometimes from stall-fed cattle.An alternative reference substance was sought and radioactivity was selected as a ineans for sensitive and completely specific analysis.The complex of 51Cr with ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (j1Cr EDTA) was tested and compared with PEG.The results which are reported here showed j3Cr EDTA to be a highly satisfactory soluble marker in sheep.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grovum, W. L., & Williams, V. J. (1973) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19730029 · Cited by 331
McSweeney, C. S., Kennedy, P. M., & John, A. (1989) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Physiology · doi:10.1016/0300-9629(89)90607-5 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Downes, A. M., & McDonald, I. W.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1964-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-162
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W1971432726
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The chromium-51 complex of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid as a soluble rumen marker. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn19640015
- The paper
- Downes, A. M., & McDonald, I. W. (1964). The chromium-51 complex of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid as a soluble rumen marker. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19640015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.